1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kamila [148]
3 years ago
9

Why did tubman decide to help the union army

History
1 answer:
nadezda [96]3 years ago
6 0
Harriet Tubman helped the union army because she had inside information.
You might be interested in
How could the government help people?
valina [46]

Answer:

government could help the people by providing several facilities help in developing process and so on

5 0
3 years ago
4. What steps led to the development of full self-government in Jamaica?
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

jamaka man this is da way

4 0
3 years ago
What role did columns play in ancient greek architecture
Airida [17]

Answer:The column is the most prominent element in Ancient Greek architecture. Columns supported the roof, but also gave buildings a feeling of order, strength, and balance. Capital - The capital was a design at the top of the column. Some were plain (like the Doric) and some were fancy (like the Corinthian).

6 0
3 years ago
What were some of the major problems america had with foreign affairs between 1785-1805:?
larisa86 [58]
<span>Attacks upon American ships by the Hawaiian Navy in the Pacific.

</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Supreme Court decide in the case of Mapp v. Ohio? A. Police should inform suspects of their right to remain silent
SCORPION-xisa [38]

In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.

<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.

The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.

Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.

Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did the United States force Native Americans to live?
    5·2 answers
  • Suppose that a woman named Harriet Miller comes before the judge in a pretrial hearing. She's charged with stealing thousands of
    8·1 answer
  • According to the constitution, which of these is not an explicit authority of the president?
    12·1 answer
  • In revolutionary mothers, what role did women play outside of their home?
    5·1 answer
  • HELPP PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
    11·2 answers
  • What best describes the major issue with the Napoleonic Code?
    15·1 answer
  • 1.) In between 1870 and 1910, what happened to the GNP (Gross National Product) and the percentage of high school graduates?
    7·1 answer
  • As president, John Adams tried to reduce foreign influence over the U.S.
    15·2 answers
  • 14.
    12·1 answer
  • The battle of puebla took place years after mexico won their independence in
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!