Answer:
Lois will save $152.51 when she wil transfer her balance.
Explanation:
Amount to be paid in 1 year for original credit card is given as
Here 
is the amount to be paid after P is the balance which is 970, 
is the APR for first credit card which is 24.2% and t is compounding frequency which is 12 so
Similarly for the second one the values are calculated as
The differnce of the two values is calculated as
The difference is $152.51 which she could save.
Answer:
Option D. It prepares employees for different positions and jobs that do not exist yet.
Explanation:
The reason is that employee development plan is to equip the existing employee with the skills that will result in increase in the employability and promotion. This will also result in increased motivation, efficiency gaining, better employee decision making, increased employability, promotions, etc. This is more in cards for employees than the employers. Thatswhy it is termed employee development programs.
Answer:
1. Accrued Revenue of $ 245
2. Accrued expenses of $ 300
3. Unearned Revenue of $ 600
4. Prepaid expenses of $ 200
5. Accrued expenses of $ 1,200
Explanation:
1. The interest on savings bond is a revenue which has been earned but not received and is thus an accrued revenue.
2. The property expenses are an accrued expenses since these have been incurred but not paid.
3. The unearned portion of the legal fees received is an unearned revenue, since services have not been provided.
4. The unexpired portion of insurance is a prepaid expense
5. Salaried due nut not paid is an accrued expenses since services ahve been received.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. Current PE ratio is
For Pacific energy company
= Price ÷ Earnings
= ($967,000 ÷ 0.13) ÷ ($967,000)
= 7.69 times
For U.S Bluechips
= Price ÷ Earnings
= ($967,000 ÷ 0.13) ÷ ($967,000)
= 7.69 times
b. The new PE ratio is
= Price ÷ Earnings
= (($967,000 + $117,000) ÷ 0.13) ÷ ($967,000)
= 8.62 times
c. The new PE ratio is
= Price ÷ Earnings
= (($967,000 + $217,000) ÷ 0.13) ÷ ($967,000)
= 9.42 times
Answer: intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Explanation:
In order for an individual to be able to make a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, it is required that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant intentionally acted recklessly or caused emotional distress to the person. In this case, there no evidence that an emotional distress was suffered.
Therefore, the theory that the cyclist is least likely to recover maximum punitive damages is intentional infliction of emotional distress.
