Answer:
Productivity is measured by the amount of output per unit of input.
In this case, the inputs will be the hours spent doing research and writing their essays. Output will equal the amount of pages written.
Marci spent 8 hours and wrote a 26 page long report, so her productivity = 26 pages / 8 hours = 3.25 pages per hour
Jack spent 20 hours and wrote a 26 page long report, so his productivity = 26 pages / 20 hours = 1.3 pages per hour
Marci is much more productive in terms of hours spent doing and writing, and how long the report is.
The problem with this type of analysis is that we do not know if Marci's report was good or bad, and the same applies to Jack's. Since we do not know what grade they got, we cannot be sure how effective their work was.
A is quite clearly the correct answer. An effective team member would not utter such a statement; an effective team member would say any of the others, however.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The colorado ranching is not expanding
Explanation:
The null hypothesis, H₀ : μ = 2.7 billion
Alternative hypothesis, Ha : μ > 2.7 billion
n = 30
The observed test statistic,
Degree of freedom = n-1 = 30 -1 = 29
Significance level = 0.05
For the critical value, we check the t - table at 0.05 significance level
Since
, we will accept H₀
That is the mean total cash receipt is 2.7 billion and the colorado ranching is not expanding
The answer to this question is that the contract is voidable. A voidable contract specificallt means that the contract can still be implemented or affirmed or rejected by one of the parties due to valid reasons. A situation where in a contract can be voidable is when the other party is not in the capacity to enter into a contract.
