Answer:
Those who examine the impact of the Holocaust on politics deal with the extent, depth, type, and dynamics of the impact but not with the impact itself. The impact itself is considered axiomatic because it is so sweeping and vast. Since the issue is so large and made up of so many overt and covert associations - direct and indirect, Jewish and pan-human, immediate and belated, ethical and practical - a general framework that presents and diagnoses the matter becomes, by nature, a telegraphic prologue to innumerable studies already carried out and yet to come.
Explanation:
The French gave up all of their territories in mainland North America, ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies.
The fact that the imperator spent a lot of resources for wars
Churchill had a claim that could have prevented Germany from taking the Sudetenland, and this claim was:
- They could have joined forces with France so that they could be safer.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim is an assertion that something is a case and typically with no evidence or proof to back it up.
In Churchill's claim, he offered NO evidence for it.
Read more about <em>Germany</em> here:
brainly.com/question/24909197
Answer:
The city
Explanation:
After the Industrial Revolution, the process of urbanization took place. This refers to a trend of people from agricultural communities moving to urban communities (cities). The main reasons for this was because cities provided people with access to high-paying jobs and cultural attractions. Life in the city was meant to be more lively and rich. However, since the 1950s, many families have decided to move outside of cities (to suburbs), as these were considered to be better for young families.
