Answer:
$124,440
Explanation:
Given a monthly principal and interest payment of $679, over the 30 year period, Naomi would have paid back
$679 * 30 year * 12 months in a year
= $244,440
With a loan amount of @120,000, the interest portion of the total repayment is therefore = total repayment less the loan amount
= $244,440 - $120000
= $124,440.
Answer:
No, a currency carry trade with positive profit can not be conducted.
Explanation:
The currency carry trade is the trading strategy where investor funding from lower-yield currency to invest in higher-yield currency with expectation to earn positive profit from the yield differences between the two currencies.
However, this strategy only works when the difference is big enough to compensate for the depreciation ( if any) of the higher-yield currency against the lower-yield currency.
With the given information, the strategy will not work because the depreciation of NZ$ against US$ after one-year is too big to be compensated for the yield difference.
For specific example, suppose the strategy is conducted, in 2008, an investor will borrow, for example, US$1 at 4.2%, exchange it to NZ$1.71. Then, invest NZ$1.71 at 9.1%.
In 2019, an investor will get NZ$1.86561 (1.71 x 1.091). The, he/she exchanges at the 2019 exchange rate, for US$1.36176 (1.86561 / 1.37). While at the same time, he will have to pay back 1 x 1.042 = US$1.042 => The loss making in US$ is US$0.32.
Answer:
The correct answers are revenue; assets.
Explanation:
Just as you can use the vertical analysis applied to the Balance Sheet, you can also analyze the Income Statement, for which exactly the same procedure as for the balance sheet is followed, and the reference value will be sales, since it is due Determine how much a certain concept represents (Sales Cost, Operating Expenses, Non-Operating Expenses, Taxes, Net Profit, etc.) with respect to the total sales.
Answer:
(C) Higher.
Explanation:
The computation of the present value in both the cases are as follows:
In the first case
Given that
Assume the par value i.e. future value be $1,000
PMT = $1,000 × 9% = $90
RATE = 9%
NPER = 7
The formula is shown below
=-PV(RATE;NPER;PMT;FV;TYPE)
After applying the above formula, the present value is $863.09
In the second case
Given that
Assume the par value i.e. future value be $1,000
PMT = $1,000 × 9% = $90
RATE = 9%
NPER = 6
The formula is shown below
=-PV(RATE;NPER;PMT;FV;TYPE)
After applying the above formula, the present value is $876.66
So as we can see that the price of the bond would increased
