Answer:
20.50
Explanation:
because its in between both numbers
Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.
Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.
Answer:
the artist should make the elegant version since the expected profits are higher
Explanation:
elegant version:
expected revenue = (400 x $150 x 40%) + (350 x $110 x 60%) = $47,100
expected profits = $47,100 - $30,000 = <u>$17,100</u>
deluxe version:
expected revenue = (500 x $110 x 40%) + (450 x $70 x 60%) = $47,100
expected profits = $42,250 - $30,000 = $12,250
Answer:
A) there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
Explanation:
Wayne hadn't done anything wrong before in the company, his behavior at the workplace could be described as very good; no complaint in 20 years and no criminal record what so ever. If Wayne was frustrated about his job, he disguised it very well. No one can predict this type of behavior if the person shows no prior signs of violence or frustration.