Answer:
Annual depreciation= $41,470
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchasing price= $393,000
Salvage value= $74,000
The machine would be run 30000 hours in the 5 years. The company ran the machine for 3900 actual hours in 2018.
To calculate the depreciation expense using the units of activity method, we need to use the following formula on each year:
Annual depreciation= [(original cost - salvage value)/useful life of production in hours]*hours operated
Annual depreciation= [(393,000 - 74,000)/30,000]*3,900
Annual depreciation= $41,470
Answer:
The correct option here is B)
Explanation:
The non compete clause is an agreement between an employer and employee ( as it is in this question between Roger and HR consulting firm ) , where an employee agree to the wishes of employer to not to work for firms which are competing against the employer in the same market.
Foreign Direct Investment is the international business strategy is generally the most expensive commitment.
<h3>What is Foreign Direct Investment?</h3>
Foreign Direct Investment is the investment of the one company investment to another country. Mostly this type of business is done by the business person to expand their business in multiple countries and establish their portfilio.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about Foreign Direct Investment, click here:
brainly.com/question/17309021
#SPJ1
Answer:
pricing low
yes
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
if either firm charges high, they either earn 11 million or 2 million.
if either firm charges low, it would earn either 15 million or 8 million.
because the payoffs of charging low is higher than the payoffs of charging high, the best strategy is for the firms to charge low if there is no cooperation.
the game is a prisoners dilemma because the choice the firms make isn't the choice that will yield the highest payoffs. the choice that would yield the highest payoffs is to both charge high prices.
The reason why consumers leave without being served because the consumers must have felt mad or upset about the service being served to them-- causing them to leave their orders or to even wait for their time for their turn of having to get their menu taken.
