Answer:
Paul Copan
Explanation:
Dr. Robertson McQuilkin can be considered a very biblical man, and as such, would always favor socialism more than free market capitalism. His phrase "Capitalism is for freedom, socialism is for equality" and the fact that he believed in a strict following of the Bible, you make him a more socialist person.
Dr. Paul Copan is also a very religious man, but his views are less extreme than Dr. McQuilkin's. He is more pragmatic and argues in favor of religion from a more neutral or agnostic point of view. He even argues that religious beliefs and economics are not mutually exclusive.
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
$ 2,500 as far as i know.
Explanation:
Answer:
$275,000
Explanation:
The computation of the value that should the land be recorded is shown below:
= Value at which rits accepted the counteroffer of the seller
= $275,000
Hence, the alue that should the land be recorded is $275,000
Basically it records the cost value as per the cost concept
The same should be considered
Answer:
Hundred Days
Explanation:
The period between March 9 and June 16, 1933, when Congress passed 15 major acts to meet the economic crisis of the Depression was called <u>the hundred Days</u>. As we know that the First New Deal began in a whirlwind of legislative action called “The First Hundred Days.” From March through June 1933, at Roosevelt’s behest, Congress passed legislation aimed at addressing the banking crisis, unemployment, and weak industrial performance, among other problems, through an “alphabet soup” of new laws and agencies.
