Answer:
1.0
Explanation:
Benefit-cost ratio BCR can be expressed in monetary or qualitative terms. It presents the relationship between the relative costs and benefits of a proposed project.
If a project has a BCR greater than 1.0, the project is expected to be attractiveto a firm and its investors.
If a project's BCR is less than 1.0, the project's costs outweigh the benefits, and it should not be considered because it is unattractive.
Answer: $30,923
Explanation:
From the question, we are told that as part of an initial investment, Jackson contributes accounts receivable that had a balance of $32,290 in the accounts of a sole proprietorship. Out of the amount, $1,367 is deemed completely worthless and for the remaining accounts, the partnership will establish a provision for possible future uncollectible accounts of $848.
The amount debited to accounts Receivable for the new partnership will be the difference between the account receivable balance and the amount that was deemed worthless. This will be:
= $32,290 - $1,367
= $30,923
Therefore, the amount debited to Accounts Receivable for the new partnership will be $30,923
Like toys r us it failed because they always had low costs and low profits from their toys.
Answer:
This error will decrease Howard's inventory by $6,000
Explanation:
Howard's inventory should include:
inventory on hand + goods purchased FOB shipping point + goods sold FOB destination point.
FOB shipping point means that the title of the goods is passed at the moment that they leave the seller's warehouse. FOB destination point means that the title of the goods is passed only after they have been delivered to the buyer's warehouse.
In this case, Howard purchased goods as FOB shipping point, so that means they should have been included in their inventory. Since they weren't, this error will decrease its inventory by $6,000.
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
