Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Socrates' view is very often described as withholding virtue and knowledge to be identical. He believes that no man knowingly does wrong. He believed that since virtue and knowledge are identical, virtue can be taught as so the professional specialty.
To discuss how to respond to the new taxes??
I'd say D. The article of Confederation didn't want the government to be too powerful and turn into a tyranny. They had a judicial branch though.
<span>The 9th Amendment reads as follows: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."</span>
