Well the farthest southeast state in the US (I'm assuming that's what you're talking about) is Florida, which has two neighbors: Alabama and Georgia
Answer:
Steve has no legal recourse against Jonathan but he can try to take action against Knell Watches.
Explanation:
The entrustment rule says that entrusting goods to a seller who deals in goods of that kind, gives that seller the power to transfer those goods and all rights to a buyer in the ordinary course of business. Entrusting includes giving your goods to the seller and leaving goods that have already been bought with the seller, with the intention of picking the goods up or having them delivered at a later stage.
Here Steve cannot claim back his watch from Jonathan because he gave the watch to Knell Watches willingly. Jonathan also bought the watch from Kevin in good faith, he had no idea that the watch had been stolen from Knell. Kevin sold the watch to him in good faith and he had no reason to doubt that the watch really belonged to Kevin because they are friends. if, however, someone else had taken the watch in to Knell Watches on behalf of Steve, then he would be able to get the watch back from Jonathan but he can't now because he took the watch in himself. Knell was also deceived by Kevin and so Jonathan is protected because of that according to Uniform Commercial Code.
Answer:
B) It was a major achievement when it was declared "separate but equal" was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Prior to the Brown v. the Board of Education Supreme Court case in 1954, there was a a doctrine in American Constitution law known as "separate but equal". This doctrine allowed people to be segregated by race in public facilities such as schools, trains and bars, as long as the quality of service remained the same.
The Supreme Court in the Brown v. the Board of Education case, ruled that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Therefore, the "separate but equal" doctrine which supported black and white students attending different public schools, was rendered unconstitutional.
A sudden violent shaking of the ground, sometimes causing great destruction, as a result of movements within the earths crust or volcanic action.
