1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
puteri [66]
4 years ago
7

In 3–5 sentences, explain how the shape of planetary orbits affects their orbital velocity. Include the proper law of planetary

motion as part of your answer.
Biology
1 answer:
skad [1K]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The planet moves faster when closer to the Sun and slower when it is far from it

Explanation:

The law of planetary motion that answers to this question is the 2nd Kepler's law, which states that:

"A line connecting the centre of the Sun to the centre of each planet sweeps out equal areas in equal time intervals"

In order to understand what are the consequence of this law to the orbital velocity of each planet, we have to keep in mind that planets have an elliptical orbit, with the Sun occupying one of the two focii (Kepler's 1st law).

As a result, the planet at some point of the orbit is farther from the Sun, while at some point is closer to it.

Given to Kepler's second law, this means that when the planet is farther, the orbital velocity must be lower (because the line connecting the planet to the Sun is longer, so it can cover the  same area moving less), while when the planet is closer to the Sun, the orbital velocity must be higher (because the line connecting the planet to the Sun is shorter, so it will cover less area if moving at the same speed.

You might be interested in
Name of the upper limb
Stells [14]

Answer:

I hope this helps u! :D

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Your friend brings you rocks with a thick layer of oxidation weathering, and no other visible signs of weathering. this is a clu
Vsevolod [243]
<span>A moist environment because physical weathering processes such as oxidation take place most quickly in the presence of water. There are three types of weathering, physical, chemical, and biological. For the physical weathering, there are two main types. Freeze-thaw cycles and exfoliation. Obviously the freeze-thaw cycles require water and the exfoliation generally happens through thermal expansion and contraction which doesn't require water. But since neither of these mechanisms were observed, that doesn't indicate if the area was wet or dry. Biological weathering is caused by plants or animals breaking down rocks via chemical (acid) or mechanical (root growth) means. Life generally indicates the presence of water, but since this form of weathering wasn't observed, we still don't have enough data. Chemical weathering is caused by rain water reacting with the rocks to form new minerals and salts. There are several types such as acidic rainwater dissolving part of the rock, and oxidation. With this in mind, let's take a look at the available options. A moist environment because there is a greater density of oxygen in the atmosphere in the presence of water. * Yes, we need a moist environment, but the density of oxygen is fairly constant world wide regardless of how moist or dry the environment is. So this is a bad choice. A moist environment because physical weathering processes such as oxidation take place most quickly in the presence of water. * Water speeds up chemical weathering of all types. So this is the correct choice. A dry environment because the increased albedo of deserts encourages physical weathering processes such as oxidation. * Yes, the increased albedo of deserts does speed up spalling, but oxidation is a CHEMICAL weathering process, not a PHYSICAL one. So this is a bad choice. A dry environment because in the absence of water oxidation is the dominant weathering process. * Water speeds up oxidation quite a bit. And since the observed oxidation is thick, there's been quite a bit of weathering. So this is a bad choice.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement explains how the fossil record supports the theory of evolution?
mr_godi [17]

It's B

Explanation:

Because the fossil record shows how organisms have evoluate from relatively simple organisms to more complex organisms

4 0
3 years ago
Read 3 more answers
What chemical feature determines if a sugar is an aldose or a ketose?
Arturiano [62]
If the epimers differ in con²gura±on around one<span> carbon or more than one carbon</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Please help fast!!!!!
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

Any letter over H.

Explanation:

Assuming no overturning took place, all fossils that are above the (d i k e) are younger than the (d i k e) as the fossils that are above the (d i k e) are still visible.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how scientific theory differ from scientific law
    8·2 answers
  • Could life have survived deep below the surface of ancient earth
    6·1 answer
  • A neuron that has as its primary function the job of connecting other neurons is called a(n) ______
    14·1 answer
  • Water _____ sunlight; thus photosynthesis in lakes and oceans does not occur below 100 meters.
    15·1 answer
  • California’s borders which ocean?
    11·2 answers
  • What is a good description for the cell wall?
    11·1 answer
  • A change in which factor will affect the rate of reaction only when gases are involved?
    6·2 answers
  • List all structures of an animal cell
    5·1 answer
  • What is a chromosome?
    9·1 answer
  • Large scale change is needed to combat climate change, but according the the author, cooperative work is best done in groups of
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!