1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenKa [72]
3 years ago
11

Joe owned a small repair shop. Each day, he would check the mail to see if any of his customers mailed in a payment for the work

he had done for them. Some days, he would receive a check or two. At other times, he would have to wait days before getting another payment. What schedule of reinforcement is evident here?
Business
1 answer:
Elza [17]3 years ago
5 0

The answer is<u> "variable interval.</u>


In operant conditioning, a variable-interval schedule is a schedule of reinforcement where a reaction is remunerated after a capricious measure of time has passed. This timetable creates a moderate, unfaltering rate of reaction.  

To see how a variable-interval schedule functions, we should begin by investigating the term itself. Schedule alludes to the rate of support conveyance, or how much of the time the fortification is given. Variable demonstrates that this planning isn't reliable and may fluctuate starting with one preliminary then onto the next. At last, interim implies that conveyance is controlled by time. In this way, a variable-interval schedule implies that support is conveyed at different and erratic intervals of time.

You might be interested in
Compute the cost assigned to ending inventory using (a) FIFO, (b) LIFO, (c) weighted average, and (d) specific identification. F
masha68 [24]

Answer:

Closing Units =  (710 units - 490 units)= 220 units

a) FIFO : closing inventory = $14,040

   Mar 18 purchase 20 *$62 =$1,240

  Mar 25 purchase 200 *$64 = $12,800

b) LIFO : closing inventory = $12,780

Mar 1 opening = 90 * $52 =$4,680

Mar 18 purchase = 110 * $62 = $6,820

Mar 25 purchase = 20*$64 =1,280

c) Weighted Average Method (WAM) :

WAM= (Opening cost + purchases cost)/(opening units +units purchased)

       = ($7,800+$14,250)/(150+250) = $55.125 cost before Mar 9 sale

WAM(after the first sale) = ($4,961.25 +$6,820 + $12,800)/(90+110+200)

                                        = $61.45

Closing Inventory = $61.45*220 =$13,519

d) Specific Identification :Closing Inventory = $13,070

Mar 01 opening = 60 *$52 =$3,120

Mar 5 Purchase = 30*$57 =$1,710

Mar 18 Purchase = 40*$62 =$2,480

Mar 25 Purchase = 90*$64 =$5,760

Explanation:

The Question is incomplete. I have provided the missing part of the question below.

Date Activities Units Acquired at Cost Units Sold at Retail

Mar. 1  Beginning inventory  150 units  $52.00/unit    

Mar. 5  Purchase  250 units  $57.00/unit    

Mar. 9  Sales      310 units  $87.00/unit

Mar. 18  Purchase  110 units  $62.00/unit    

Mar. 25  Purchase  200 units  $64.00/unit    

Mar. 29  Sales      180 units  $97.00/unit

     Totals  710 units   490 units

5 0
4 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
2. X Company has the following accounting balances at the end of the year before adjustments: Accounts receivable $ 50,000 Allow
elixir [45]

Answer:Bad debt expenses will be $2000 on the income statement and Allowance for uncollectible Accounts will be ($3000) on the balance sheet.

Explanation:

The bad debt accounts and allowance for uncollectible accounts are stated in the income and balance sheet statement respectively yearly to monitor activities on collectible debts.

A firm based on his experience determined an estimated percentage of debts outstanding for the year that are likely to go bad. If the new estimate is greater than the previous year, the difference is debited to income statement and if the new estimate is less than the previous year estimate the difference is credited to the income statement.

In the above scenario the new year estimate is greater than previous year by $ 2000 and that lead to $2000 to be debited to income statement.

The balance is made to reflect the total of the new estimate to be deducted from collectible debt and this is why ($3000) goes to the balance sheet.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the tort doctrine of ________, any time an employee is liable for tortious acts in the scope of employment, the emp
My name is Ann [436]

According to the tort doctrine of <u>respondeat superior</u> , any time an employee is liable for tortious acts in the scope of employment,

<h3>What is tortious acts?</h3>

Tortious acts is an act that occur when a person is harm as a result of another action which inturn lead to legal liability for the person who committed the act.

Hence, Respondeat superior stated that an when an employee is liable for committing  tortious acts the employer is as well liable for the same act.

Learn more about Tortious acts here:

brainly.com/question/15570864

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
What are the right questions to ask to understand a business model
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

What problem are you solving?

Is there a true need? Or will you need to differentiate yourself?

Why is the problem important?

What is your solution?

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Executives with a particular mix of skills and experiences may be classified as an executive type and paired with a specific per
    9·1 answer
  • Differential Analysis for Machine Replacement Boyer Digital Components Company assembles circuit boards by using a manually oper
    15·1 answer
  • At a price of $8.5 per ticket, a musical theater group can fill every seat in their 1800 seat performance hall. For every additi
    7·1 answer
  • Norton Corporation received cash from issuing 10-year $200,000 bonds at face value. Interest of $10,000 is paid annually to the
    6·1 answer
  • Regional Investment Corporation (RIC) hires Sam, a real estate agent, to locate investment properties for RIC. Sam learns of a w
    6·1 answer
  • Kinder Enterprises relies heavily on a copier machine to process its paperwork. Recently the copy clerk has not been able to pro
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is false? Group of answer choices If economic profit is positive, accounting profit must also
    15·1 answer
  • Assume that a $1,00,000 par value, semiannual coupon U.S. Treasury note with five years to maturity (YTM) has a coupon rate of 5
    8·1 answer
  • What does "the customer is always right" mean
    5·1 answer
  • "You are a manager, and you are meeting with your boss to discuss your development plan. You have decided to benchmark Camp Bow
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!