All categories

2 years ago

Why is it more likely that employee referral programs are effective and successful?

Business

1 answer:

777dan777 [17]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

These programs are usually effective and successful because the current employees that provide for this program tend to be the more highly efficient employees in the company and they tend to recruit individuals who they personally know as responsible and qualified. This therefore not only brings in qualified candidates but also saves the company money on recruiters and trainers, since the employee themselves can train the new recruit.

You might be interested in

Each wholesale bag of flour is sold in 25kg bags. Using this information, calculate a new column of data of that works out how m

Sav [38]

Answer:

I know the answer

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

If you have 1-year rate is 8%, 2-year rate is 9%, and 3-year rate is 10%. Assume that the pure expectations theory for the term

e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)

Explanation:

Given:

1-year rate = 8%

2-year rate = 9%

3-year rate = 10%

Computation:

According to Pure Expectations Hypothesis,

(1 + 3-year rate)³ = (1 + 2-year rate)² (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)

(1.10)³ = (1 + 1.09)²(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)

1.331 = 1.1881 (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)

(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now) = 1.12

1 year rate 2 year from now = 0.12

1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)

3 0

3 years ago

Under _____, a company compares some dimension of its performance to that of another firm, be it a competitor or in a totally di

denis-greek [22]

Under Price discrimination, an organization compares a few dimensions of its performance to that of another company, be it a competitor or in a totally distinctive industry.

Charge discrimination is a promoting method that fees clients one-of-a-kind charges for the same products or services based on what the seller thinks they can get the patron to comply with. In natural price discrimination, the vendor fees every customer the most fee they'll pay.

Charge discrimination refers to charging distinct clients special costs for the same true carrier. The Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, and Robinson-Patman Act outlaw price discrimination while the intent of that discrimination is to harm competitors.

Price discrimination in a monopoly is a practice of charging extraordinary costs for an equal product. Monopolies generally have extra control over providers than ordinary sellers, which means that they can notably impact the providers' promoting prices.

Learn more about Price discrimination here: brainly.com/question/23342760

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

he _____ rate is the percentage of a company's customers (within a given span of time) who by the end of that time span have

Sauron [17]

Answer:

B) churn

Explanation:

The churn rate refers to the percentage of customers lost by a company (usually during a 1 year span) either because they stopped a subscription or stopped purchasing its products.

The churn rate can also refer to the percentage of employees leaving or quitting a company during one year.

7 0

3 years ago

Two investment advisers are comparing performance. Adviser A averaged a 20% return with a portfolio beta of 1.5, and adviser B a

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

Option A is the correct answer.

A. Advisor A was better because he generated a larger alpha.

Explanation:

To determine which adviser would be the better stock selector, we will calculate the required rate of return of each adviser and the return actually averaged. The adviser with the greater abnormal return, which is return in excess of required rate, will be the better stock selector.

Using the CAPM, we can calculate the required rate of return on a stock. This is the minimum return required by the investors to invest in a stock based on its systematic risk, the market's risk premium and the risk free rate.

The formula for required rate of return under CAPM is,

r = rRF + Beta * (rM - rRF)

Where,

rRF is the risk free rate

rM is the market return

r of Adviser A = 0.05 + 1.5 * (0.13 - 0.05)

r of Adviser A = 0.17 or 17%

Abnormal or excess return of Adviser A = 20% - 17% = 3%

r of Adviser B = 0.05 + 1.2 * (0.13 - 0.05)

r of Adviser B = 0.146 or 14.6%

Abnormal or excess return of Adviser B = 15% - 14.6% = 0.4%

Adviser A performed better as the excessive return or alpha of Adviser A was 3% while that of Adviser B was 0.4%

7 0

2 years ago