1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lidiya [134]
3 years ago
11

. List 4 things you saw in the movie that demonstrate Rome's reach beyond the city of Rome itself. In other words, what are some

examples of non-Roman things in the Roman empire?
History
1 answer:
shutvik [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

read below :)

Explanation:

  • The places include Germania, which is the border where the pagan tribes encountered defeat at the hands of the Roman legions. This is the first scene whereafter the aging Emperor decides it is time to consolidate the Pax romana (Roman peace).
  • Maximus is a general that comes from Hispania, which is a region controlled by the Romans that includes the Iberia penninsula.
  • This was one of the limits of the Empire westwards, and the origin of the Spaniard means that the territories were under Roman control.
  • The other territories that are featured are the deserts which belonged to Zucchabar , currently in Africa. They are the territories where the Roman Empire expanded and are featured as one of the scenarios for a Gladiators exhibition.
  • A ever present feature , a fourth characteristic is the wide use of classical Greek art mainly portrayed as sculptures during the entire movie.

You might be interested in
What moderates much of the air temperature over northwestern Europe?
Pachacha [2.7K]
B north atlantic drift, i hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
The Indian conflicts in the West—especially in the Great Plains—arose because Native Americans and settlers had completely diffe
TEA [102]
Native Americans lived freely in the lands. It belonged to the tribes and not to individuals and anyone could use its wealth as long as it wasn't exploitation or destructive. They practiced their cultural beliefs and didn't think that there should be a reason for them to move out of the land.

The Settlers were capitalists so they wanted the land to use it for agriculture and hunting and things like that and to sell it and buy it individually as personal property. They also believed that the Natives were savages and that their beliefs were blasphemous and that they had no claim to the land at all.<span />
3 0
3 years ago
What are some major events and achievements in Mandela's life?
Lina20 [59]
Nelson Mandela was referred as one of the great figures in the past century for many reasons. First of all, Nelson Mandela was an anti-apartheid leader who became South Africa's first black president. Second of all, major events and achievements that Nelson Mandela consummated in his life is in 1952, Mandela leads the defiance campaign which encouraged people to break segregation laws and he passed an exam in order to be an attorney, and with Tambo, establishes the first black law partnership in the country. In 1961, he helps establish ANC guerilla wing, Umkhunto we sizwe, or spear of the nation. And last but not least, in 1994, Nelson Mandela became the first black president after democratic elections as an achievement that will never be forgotten in black history.
8 0
2 years ago
Why did the Great Britain raised taxes in 1763?
masha68 [24]
They raised taxes because of something called <span>mercantilism</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Potters and Holts historical interpretation of the Civil War.
lakkis [162]
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:  

Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.  

Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:

Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Barney leaves a bar and 2am and gets arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. He will first be subject to...
    14·2 answers
  • Plz help asap plz with every question
    9·1 answer
  • Which Greek leader invaded Persia around 330 B.C.E.? A. Chieftain Achaemenes B. Genghis Khan C. Mustafa Kemal Atat rk D. Alexand
    12·1 answer
  • What were the Jews accused of in Germany after World War I?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an advantage of the South had over the North?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were many urban factory workers supportive of the passage of the Homestead Act of 1862?
    8·1 answer
  • Frederick Douglass
    13·1 answer
  • pls help answer this, Which statement describes a reason the United States entered World War Ion the Allied side
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following nations revolted violently in an attempt to get the united states to leave their country ?
    13·1 answer
  • you are early american. Write a journal entry describing an encounter with native American people in one regions described in th
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!