30 is the correct answer also I’ve downed coffee and monster
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
If triangles EFG and QRS are similar
then
the scale factor is equal to the measure of the smallest side of triangle QRS divided by the smallest side of triangle EFG
so
Let
x-------> the smallest side of triangle QRS
y-------> the smallest side of triangle EFG
z-------> the scale factor
we have

substitute the values


Find the length of the longest side of QRS
The length of the longest side of QRS is equal to multiply the scale factor by the length of the longest side of EFG
so

1) gradient of line = Δ y ÷ Δ x
= (5 -2) ÷ (3 - (-6))
= ¹/₃
using the point-slope form (y-y₁) = m(x-x₁)
using (3,5)
(y - 5) = ¹/₃ (x -3)
y - 5 = ¹/₃x - 1
⇒ <span> y = ¹/₃ x + 4 [OPTION D]
</span>2) y = 2x + 5 .... (1)
<span> </span>y = ¹/₂ x + 6 .... (2)
by substituting y in (1) for y in (2)
2x + 5 = ¹/₂ x + 6
³/₂ x = 1
x = ²/₃
by substituting found x (2)
y = ¹/₂ (²/₃) + 6
y = ¹⁹/₃
∴ common point is (²/₃ , ¹⁹/₃) thus answer is FALSE [OPTION B]
3) Yes [OPTION A]
This is because the both have a gradient of 5 and if they have the same gradient then that means that the two lines are parallel to each other.
4) No [OPTION B]
Two lines are perpendicular if their gradients multiply to give - 1 and as such one is the negative reciprocal of the other. Since both gradients are ¹/₂ then they are actually parallel and not perpendicular.
Solution :
1). The cost of the formula is given as :
$ 19,350 + $12 x
2). 95%
for the prediction is :


(rounding off)
3). r = 0.92
Therefore, 
That is 84.64 % of the variability in the moving cost is best explained by the number of moves.
Answer:
f(5)=-1
Step-by-step explanation: