Explanation:
1 True 2 True 3 True 4 5 True
Answer is D mange cartoons often exaggerate
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
The Texan Rangers were the regulators in the texan border. Regulators were Texas rangers who patrolled the streets terrorising Mexicans and hunting down American-Indian livestock rustlers. When Texas required independence from Mexico in order to operate alone as a republic, the regulators and rangers came to power.
Charles W. Jackson and Charles W. Moorman were the main Regulators commanders, and their main objective was to stop cattle rustling. But when the Regulators' acts grew out of control, a rival vigilante organisation known as the Moderators was established to "moderate" the Regulators.
To learn more Texas refer
brainly.com/question/20737446
#SPJ4
