Answer:
The answer is - Inferences
Explanation:
The options are:
A. contaminated observations.
B. inferences.
C. distorted behaviors.
D. illusory correlations.
The answer is B- inferences
Inference can be defined as a logical conclusion which is gotten on the basis of evidence and logical reasoning and through the use of knowledge and information.
In the scenario here, it is reasonable to infer that the SUV hit the smaller car due to the evidence that the smaller car is damaged while the SUV which is bigger only has a headlight broken.
Well, personally I think that it is flawed: it limits the inflow of new ideas into politics.
I think that one way to address it is to abolish the electoral college and introduce country-wide representative elections and not a "winner takes it all" system.
Answer: certainly not.
Explanation: Nobody is ugly (except Rijk for asking this) this poor girl is also not ugly. Do not only look at the outside, look at the inside.
Answer:
Carol Gilligan believed earlier researchers into morality had overlooked the perspective of females.
Explanation:
Gilligan was Kohlberg's reserach assistant, but argued that Kohlberg's stages of moral development were male-orientated. Therefore, these stages were limited in there ability to be generalized to females. Because of these, Gilligan proposed her theory of stages of female moral development.
Answer: This shows that Dad shows more care for the prospector than he shows more care for his children
Explanation:
Dad has a great care for the Prospector. This same care is not shown for the kids who were sliding around the back and screaming. This shows that Dad shows more care for the prospector than he shows more care for his children. Some parents do this, as they place emphasis on things than they do for their children
