Answer:
The galaxy is moving closer to us
Explanation:
When there is a decrease in the wavelength of light which is being observed then it means that the object and observer are getting closer to each other.
When there is an increase in the wavelength of light which is being observed then it means that the object and observer are getting farther apart.
This phenomenon is called the Doppler effect.
Orange has shorter wavelength than red so the wavelength is getting shorter.
Hence, the galaxy is moving closer to us.
Answer: Karen is most likely using a STRUCTURED INTERVIEW.
Explanation: A structured interview commonly used in survey research is a type of formal meeting, in person, for the assessment of a candidate or applicant that each individual is presented with the same exact question in the same order.
This is a means of collecting data for a statistical survey. The choice of answers to the questions is often fixed. Though open-ended questions can also be included within a structured interview.
Officially, Alex is not in the labor force.
Given that he is not actually employed (doesn't have an actual job), he cannot be considered part of the labor force. If he had some kind of job other than taking care of his children (even if it's a freelance job he can do from his home), then he would be in the labor force. However, this way, he is not and fall into the same category as unemployed students, for example.
The answer is B)<span> They were successful due to a single leader or dynastic regime maintaining control of the government.
</span>
All these government were authoritarian and except for North Korea, all have since collapsed.
The one common factor among, Iraq, Libya and North Korea was that all of these were ruled by one family who were able to maintain strict control over the local population.
Even during economic upheavals, the strong one-party/family control ensured that the country endured.
<span></span>
Answer:
I think the central idea of the passage is that the family Otzi's father is common in Europe.
Explanation:
My justification for my answer is that his DNA kind of matched the one of the people living in the Neolithic Age. This shows that maybe he was a descendant of those people.
I think the first answer is wrong because people of the Neolithic Age were from the past and I don't think DNA existed by then.
And the think the second is wrong because his mother's family was just rare it wasn't complex.
Finally the last is wrong because the DNA wasn't so hard to test it was also easy to compare it because there were other samples to be compared with.
That leaves us with the last answer as correct.
HOPE IT HELPED
