Each judgement/ statement has been paired with a descriptor:
What he did was praiseworthy because it was so selfless. [Ethical: Based on the principals of "right vs. wrong]
We should not refer to fellow humans as "homeless" if we truly consider human life as valuable in itself, since that label equates human value with the value of brick and mortar. [Aesthetic: Based on a feeling of value of art, beauty, and/or taste]
You ought to stand when the Queen enters the room. [Cultural: Based on social cultural acceptability]
You better pay your taxes if you wish to avoid jail-time. [Legal: Based in law; Not paying taxes is punishable by law]
You better pay your taxes since fair membership in communal living requires sharing in both the benefits and the burdens of that co-existence. [Ethical: Based on the principals of "right vs. wrong]
The statement that "In the looking at diversity feature "socioeconomic stereotyping" Christa Kilvington, a straight-a student and single mother on public assistance, suggests that the stereotypes people use to classify her shape the way they communicate with her" is true. In the article "In he looking at diversity feature" <span>she describes what it is like being a "4.0 college student" as well as a "welfare mom".</span>
Answer:
I think angels ......,..............
Answer:
Group polarization.
Explanation:
Group polarization is when inside a group what first was an inclination to some ideas, after the individuals talk, those same ideas become much more stronger and radical. As the exercise exemplifies, the jury is deliberating and their initial attitudes are leaning neutral to slighty toward a guilty verdict. After a few days of deliberation, their ideas have strengthened considerably toward a guilty verdict. That's a good example of group polarization.