No, because he says that the squirt is not as chivalrous as the night, because he has relations with a women. The knight is the epitome of chivalry, and fights in the Crusades, God’s holy wars, but the squire is not focused on saving others
Answer:
I believe the answer would be "is being torn down soon".
Explanation:
It's been years since I've learned about prepositional phrases (I did so in 7th grade), but from what I understand prepositional phrases complete the sentence. So, "is being torn down soon" completes the sentence. Without that phrase, the sentence would not make sense and would instead be a fragment.
I am actually working on this play myself, I play titania and I can tell you the answer is C
C) Giving an object human characteristics.
It has been frequently and rightly remarked that the Crito is unique among
Plato’s dialogues insofar as its primary concern is what Socrates ought to do.
2
Most interpreters assume that Socrates ought to do what seems best to his reason (Cr 46b3-6); thus, most interpretations defend the rationality of obedience
or disobedience. On my account, it is not at all obvious that Socrates ought to
do what seems best to his reason. On my account, Socrates does not do what
seems best to his reason because he does not reason about whether he should
obey the laws; he simply obeys the laws. Doubtless, this claim seems counterintuitive to many; after all, does not Socrates articulate and defend his reasons
for remaining in prison from 49c to 54c? Is it not the cogency of Socrates’ reasons
for remaining in prison that have been so thoroughly debated in the scholarship summarized below? My answer to both of these questions is ‘no.’ Perhaps
counter-intuitively I claim that the reasons for remaining in prison, from Crito
49c to54c, are not Socrates’ reasons; they are the arguments of the speaking laws
of Athens