Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer:you cant see it coming
Explanation:
<span>I think your question has some options :)
In any case, a fitting metaphor or comparison for the internet would be a large network of roads- the cables that transport it would be the roads. </span>
They were committing treason against the british crowne and if they were caught and captured they risked death
Answer:
<em><u>An itinerary is a plan of a journey showing the route and the places that the visitor will visit. Thus, it is a schedule or timetable produced in association with a package tour</u></em><em><u>To find out the per person cost of the tour you have to divide the total tour cost by the total number of people travelling for the tour. So here, Rs. 22706 if divided by 14 people (12 students and 2 faculty), the per person cost comes to Rs. 1621.85/- You have to round this figure to Rs.</u></em><em><u>When planning a flight itinerary there are three (3) basic rules to follow: Avoid crisscrossing; Avoid backtracking; Remember that less carriers used, the better.</u></em>
