<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
The answer is why does the government not make the affordable health care plan?
they all include studying, either history or people, or nature. they all include observing something and studying it.
The theory that infants use their early relationships to develop a set of assumptions that become a frame of reference for later in life is the working model.
<h3>What is the working model in psychology?</h3>
In psychology, this model is the representation that children while they are infants are able to have mental representations through the relationships they form with their care givers.
The model is known to influence how the child is able to bond and form relationships with other people as they grow.
Read more on child psychology here: brainly.com/question/3951300
#SPJ1
He argued something very straight saying that people is rational bu selfish with its money. we know this because <span>in his famous book </span>The Wealth Of Nations<span> argued that a free-market economy is largely self-regulating.</span>He advocated capitalism, but not unrestrained capitalism.Hope this can help a lot
