There are many different scenarios of how to establish order but the most efficient way is through a simple democracy. A direct democracy where no in particular is in charge. Everyone has a say or opinion. Putting things up to a vote as a group makes things fair in a way having an individual leader making the decisions wouldn’t. There would be no fights for leadership or too much indecision on any one topic. Voting, expression, and communication through a small simplified version of direct democracy for survival purposes would be most efficient. Plus it would make for a good foundation of trust and teamwork. It is however possible for someone to rise up amongst the rest and lead properly. Its possible but it’d present more cons than pros in the long run.
Hope this helps!
Had a voice in their government.
Earlier civilizations was a complete monarchy
In Mexico<span>, a </span>maquiladora<span> </span>or maquila <span>a </span>manufacturing<span> operation, where </span>factories <span>import certain material and equipment on a </span>duty-free<span> and </span>tariff-free <span>basis for assembly, processing, or manufacturing and then export the assembled, processed and/or manufactured products, sometimes back to the raw materials' country of origin. They are an example of </span>special economic zones<span> as seen in many countries.</span>
Ok good c: , need anymore help?
The maryland toleration act did not bring complete religious freedom, as is so often assumed, and as a reading of this document will quickly prove. nor did it come about because of a profound humanistic conviction on the part of lord baltimore, the maryland proprietor. the act was a pragmatic solution to a serious problem. the catholics in originally catholic maryland had become a minority of the population although still powerful politically. they were in great danger of being ill-treated by the protestant majority. the toleration act, it was believed, was a way of providing protection for catholics while at the same time representing a nod in the direction of the english government, which in 1649 and for a dozen years thereafter was firmly under the control of the english puritans. nonetheless, the document is important because it did provide modest although impermanent protection for catholic marylanders and set a precedent to which others could refer. despite baltimore's catholic background and his desire to use maryland as a refuge for catholics persecuted elsewhere, the catholic church never became the established church. in the eighteenth century this distinction was given to the church of england.
