Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:
The slope of the line is -5
Angles 6 and 7, because they are alternate along the transversal.
Also angles 1 and 4.
A) The domain remains the same.
Since, in y = - 2 f(x) , the y is whats being multiplied and therefore changed, not the x or domain.
Therefore D[-6,10] <span>
The range is what changes by a factor of -2.
If the original range was [-8,12], then the new one is
[(-8 x -2),(12 x -2)] = [16 , -24].
However, you must flip the numbers to make the interval true, giving you R [-24,16]</span>
