True because for someone to do ‘something’ there’s a reason/purpose behind whey they’re doing it in the first place
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
<span> the difference between atmosphere and biosphere</span><span> is that </span>atmosphere<span> is the gases surrounding the earth or any astronomical body while </span>biosphere<span> is the part of the earth and its atmosphere capable of supporting life. </span>
Ce clasă ești sa văd daca te pot ajuta
