Answer:
From the information given about the contract and its execution between the two parties involved( That is, Parc and Glaze), the option 2 is most likely.
2. Glaze will win because Glaze substantially performed and Parc prevented complete performance.
Explanation:
It is stated that Glaze was hired to remodel and furnish an office suite, after a submitted plans by Glaze were approved by Parc. It was further stated that the construction and painting had been done.
Although, with Glaze purchasing minor accessories which Parc rejected because they did not conform to the plans is a breach of contract, but that can be corrected by calling Glaze to order. However, it was Parc that refused to allow Glaze to make necessary corretion and complete the project and also refused to pay Glaze any part of the contract price.
Answer:
Individualistic
Explanation:
Individualistic mindset focuses on the individual and gives them more emphasis than the group.
The opposite of individualism is collectivism or group mentality which emphasise the group over the individual.
To discuss the merger between the two companies, ABC company only sent one person while XYZ company sent 5 people from different departments.
ABC is most likely have a individualistic mindset and they feel one person can handle the negotiation.
On the other hand XYZ sent representatives from each department. This shows the organisation has to agree to the deal so all departments are involved.
Answer:
The Business Auto Coverage Form in this case will cover for tile damages that occur due to accidents brought about during the transfer of property from a covered auto to the place where the property is finally delivered. The damages that occurred on the pavers will not be covered because of the care, custody, and/or control exclusion clause.
Depending on her area and expertise i would recommend a state website or a government approved agency
