All categories

4 years ago

PLEASE HELP!! 50Points!! Im confused!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Alekssandra [29.7K]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Two angle are side to be compliment if there sum is 90°

<B + <A = 90°

<B = 90° - <A

<B = 90° - 40°

<B = 50°

Two angle are side to be compliment if there sum is 180°

<B + <C = 180°

<C = 180° - <B

<C = 180° - 50°

<C = 130°

m<B + m<C = 50° + 130° = 180°

malfutka [58]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Two angle are side to be compliment if there sum is 90°

<B + <A = 90°

<B = 90° - <A

<B = 90° - 40°

<B = 50°

Two angle are side to be compliment if there sum is 180°

<B + <C = 180°

<C = 180° - <B

<C = 180° - 50°

<C = 130°

m<B + m<C = 50° + 130° = 180°

You might be interested in

A factory uses 1/6 of barrel of raisins in each batch of granola bars. Yesterday,the factory used 7/6 barrels of raisins. how ma

Vikki [24]

The factory made 7 batches of granola bars yesterday.

8 0

3 years ago

Select all that applies

Volgvan

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You can pretty easily find the answer by just going through each statement and analyzing what it means. For A it asks if AB is parallel to DC (parallel means the lines could go on for infinity without ever touching) Looking at the shape we can see that AB and DC are on opposite sides and are slanted in the same direction meaning that they are in fact parallel. This could be correct. The next asks about angle BCD and whether or not it is congruent to CDA (congruent is just another word for the same) Angle BCD is the top right angle and we know this by following the letters on the shape in the order they were asked in the question. We can see that these two angles are not congruent just via observation as BCD is an acute angle (less than 90 degrees with a right angle as a reference) and CDA is an obtuse angle (greater than 90 degrees) This answer choice is incorrect. Next up we have BPC and APD and it asks whether or not they are congruent. We can apply the same logic to the previous choice and find out that they are in fact congruent angles which is also backed up by the rule of vertical angles which states that all vertical angles are congruent. This means C is also a correct option. Next up is line BC compared with AD which are very obviously congruent just by looking at the image, but we also know that opposite sides of a parallelogram are always congruent. This answer choice is correct also. Next up it asks us about AC in comparison to BD which are NOT congruent because each line has a different length due to the fact of the angles they are coming from. AP is in fact congruent to PC because it is just a continual of the original line which stems from halfway across the middle of the parallelogram. This IS a correct choice. Next up it asks about supplementary angles and it is important to understand what that is before you can accurately answer the question. Supplementary angles are angles which will total 180 degrees and the question specifically asks in relation to angles BAD and ADC. These angles are in fact supplementary because they are across from each other at the base of the parallelogram and we know from theories that these angles will always be supplementary in these shapes. G is also a correct answer. Last but not least we have a question asking us about APB and APD and whether or not they are vertical angles. Vertical angles are angles which are across from each other either vertically as the name sake says or horizontally, but they have to be directly across from each other. Looking at the image we can clearly see that these angles are NOT across from each other but instead are adjacent to each other (next to each other) meaning the last option is not correct. This leaves A,C,D,F, and G as the correct answers.

7 0

3 years ago

Find the surface area #3

horrorfan [7]

The surface area would be <span>4633.95 mm</span>

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Mick paid $2.94 in sales tax on an item that cost $42.00 before tax. At that rate, how much would he paying sales tax before an

sergiy2304 [10]

To answer this question you would have two steps involved. The first step would be to find the percentage of $42 that gives us $2.94. Set up an equation 42x=2.94. Divide both sides by 42 to get the decimal 0.07. This equal 7%. Take this percentage multiplied by the $58. You need to change the 7% into 0.07 to be able to calculate it. 0.07 x 58 = $4.06 sales tax.

5 0

4 years ago

Given the following relations on the set of all integers where (x,y)∈R if and only if the following is satisfied. (Check ALL cor

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

a) symmetric

b) symmetric, reflexive, transitive

c) antisymmetric

d) symmetric

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) x+y = 0

- this relation is not reflexive, because the only element that relates with itself is 0. x+x = 2x, x+x = 0 only if 2x = 0, hence x = 0. Since 0 relates with itself, then the relation isnt irreflexive either.

Note that for x,y such that x R y, we have that x+y = 0, therefore, y = -x.

-If x,y,z are such that x R y, y R z, then y = -x, z = -y = -(-x) = x. In general x does not relate with z because z=x and the relation isnt reflexive, thus the relation is not transitive. For example, if x = z = 2, y = -2, we have that xRy, yRz, but x does not relate with z.

- This realtion is symmetric due to the commutativity of the sum. If xRy, then x+y = 0, and y+x = x+y = 0, hence yRx. Therefore, the relation cant be antisymmetric, because every element different from 0 relates to its opposite. For example 2R-2, -2R2 but 2 ≠ -2.

b) x-y is an integer

Since we are taking the substraction of two integers, the result will always be integer. Hence, every pair of elements relate within each other. As a result, the relation is symmetric, reflexive and transitive. However, it is not irreflexive nor antisymmetric, because for example 4R4, and 4R8, 8R4, but 4 is not 8.

c) x = 2y

Note that x = 2x only if x = 0, so the relation is neither reflexive nor irreflexive.

The relation is not symmetric, for example, 4R2 because 4 = 2*2, but 2 does not relate with 4, because 4*2 = 8. However, the relation is antisymmetric, because if xRy, yR2, we have

x = 2y

y = 2x = 2(2y) = 4y

since y = 4y, y should be 0, and x = 2*0 = 0. Therefore x=y = 0. The relation is antisymmetric.

The relation isnt transitive: 2R4, 4R8, but 2 does not relate with 8 because 8*2 = 16.

d) xy>1

since 0² = 0, 0 does not relate with itself, hence the relation is not reflexive. It is not irreflexive either, because, for example, 2*2 = 4 > 2, thus 2 relates with itself.

The relation is not transitive: 1 relates with every integer greater than itself, but it does not relate with itself, for example 1R7 and 7R1 because 1*7=7*1 = 7 > 1, but 1*1 = 1, it is not greater than 1, hence 1 doesnt relate with itself. This also shows that the relation is not antisymmetric either, because 1R7, 7R1 but 1≠7. The relation, however, is symmetric due to the commutativity of the product. If xy > 1, then yx = xy >1 as well.

I hope that works for you!

8 0

4 years ago