The Transcendentalists were radical thinkers. At the time of their meetings, New England was still holding on to a remnant of Puritanical values. There was a sense that organized religion had authority over one's personal life and individual choices. For the Transcendentalists, this was a big no-no! They were quite critical of conformity, or forcing one's behavior to match social expectations or standards. They were nonconformists - people who do not conform to a generally accepted pattern of thought or action. They rejected common ideas and practices, particularly organized religion. There wasn't a Transcendentalist church or a holy book of Transcendentalism. Instead, there were regular meetings for lively conversation and a shared hope of cultivating a modern, fluid, and personal sense of spirituality.
Answer: I strongly believe teachers should have easy access to a gun or other firearms. With proper training, a gun could save lives in an emergency or life-or-death situation. School shooters are rare, but in the event where you need to save your life, a gun is the perfect solution. If teachers were trained to use a gun properly, he/she could save the lives of students, and themselves, in a responsible manner. However, a gun wouldn’t just be granted upon them. A teacher running around with a free gun could be dangerous to the students or other staff members. We would need to be careful with the teachers access to gun use.
Answer:
Our ancestors had to seek out their food from the environment, and their perception of taste was important for survival and thriving. “For our ancestors, the ability to assess the caloric and nutritive value of food in the environment and to detect dangerous or poisonous foods (which would tend to be bitter or sour) were probably critical to survival, particularly as they moved from one ecological niche to another and encountered new potential sources of food,” says O’Connell.
“In our ancestral human population, those who had the ability to perceive dangerous compounds in their food could better avoid them, and those who could better assess the nutritive and caloric value of their food could get a good supply of energy. But, of course, if you had both of these abilities, then you would have had a distinct selective advantage and were most likely better-nourished and healthier, and as a result more likely to reproduce and pass on your set of genes for taste.”
Explanation:
State or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
