The speaker's statement allows the inference that the speaker believes she has earned the right to be in her private space.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The speaker believes that the private space she dominates is hers by right.
- This right is linked to her blood, that is, her ancestry, her life.
- Thus, he reinforces that the connection between him and the private space is very strong and insurmountable, making it impossible to separate them.
This connection so strong and intense is what creates her right to keep her private place to herself, with no one to interfere.
More information:
brainly.com/question/12207798?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
How ma i supposed to know when i dont even have the words i can use?
Explanation:
The dependent clause would be : “since he was not there,” because the phrase on its own is incomplete .
Answer:
This story would have been quite different if the husband had been the narrator, as the couple were opposites bound by love.
Explanation:
- The original passage is in third person point of view so that the readers resonate with Mathilde.
- The story wouldn't have been exaggerated much in some instances.
- We would have understood the husband's struggle in finding the necklace.
- The husband is someone who enjoys simple things in life which would be quite different from Mathilde's point of view- she placed value in luxury that she doesnt posess.
