1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
borishaifa [10]
3 years ago
13

Question 6 of 15, Step 1 of 1

Mathematics
1 answer:
OLga [1]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

3 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

369 divided by (58+65)

You might be interested in
Can you please help me ​
mixer [17]

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

cause both are congruent which means the same size if one has 14 why shouldnt the other too

3 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Find the directional derivative of f(x,y,z)=2z2x+y3f(x,y,z)=2z2x+y3 at the point (−1,4,3)(−1,4,3) in the direction of the vector
Feliz [49]

f(x,y,z)=2z^2x+y^3

f has gradient

\nabla f(x,y,z)=2z^2\,\vec\imath+3y^2\,\vec\jmath+4xz\,\vec k

which at the point (-1, 4, 3) has a value of

\nabla f(-1,4,3)=18\,\vec\imath+48\,\vec\jmath-12\,\vec k

I'm not sure what the given direction vector is supposed to be, but my best guess is that it's intended to say \vec u=15\,\vec\imath+25\,\vec\jmath, in which case we have

\|\vec u\|=\sqrt{15^2+25^2}=5\sqrt{34}

Then the derivative of f at (-1, 4, 3) in the direction of \vec u is

D_{\vec u}f(-1,4,3)=\nabla f(-1,4,3)\cdot\dfrac{\vec u}{\|\vec u\|}=\boxed{\dfrac{294}{\sqrt{34}}}

4 0
3 years ago
What is the answer to 21=(x+3)2
IceJOKER [234]
First, distribute 2 to the (x+3) to get:
21 = 2x+6
subtract 6 from both sides to get:
15 = 2x
Finally, we divide both sides by 2 to simplify x to:
x = 7.5 (OR) x = 7  \frac{1}{2}
(Just so you know, if you pick a brainliest answer, both you and the person who got the brainliest answer get some points.
3 0
4 years ago
Mx-y when m=2,x=7. And y= 5
Aleks [24]
(2•7)-5
14-5= 9
So the answer is 9
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ryan invested $5,900 in an account paying an interest rate of 5%
    9·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me please
    11·1 answer
  • Help number one plzzzz
    10·1 answer
  • Please help, greatly appreciated
    15·1 answer
  • Would a patient be receiving more medication if his dosage is decreased by 50 milligrams or if it is decreased by 25 milligrams?
    11·1 answer
  • there are 453.592 grams in one pound. A semi-slick, Kevlar tire weighs about 520 grams. what is the tires weight in pounds?
    6·1 answer
  • If I have an acid with a pH of 5 and an acid with a pH of 3 which is stronger and by how much? 5, by 10 times
    13·1 answer
  • Find the area of the shaded region.
    10·1 answer
  • Missy and Andrew want to figure out which restaurant has the best deal on french fries. They record the cost of an order of fren
    6·2 answers
  • Write each expression with a single exponent:
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!