Answer:
1. sexual
2. gender
3. quid pro quo
4. a) was not; b) did not
5. pattern
6. a) severe b) alter c) abusive
7. yes
8. yes
Explanation:
Stander´s conduct was sexually offensive because the coworker repeatedly complained about the situation. Also you can see a pattern because Stander´s behavior cannot be counted as a single event, but occured on various occasions.
Dude above me imported a good file answer his
Steve has used the foot-in-the-door <span>technique to induce compliance.
A foot in the door technique is a persuasion technique that makes a person to agree to do a small favor and asking that person to do a bigger favor after the small favor is done. According to research, </span><span> The foot-in-the-door technique succeeds owing to a basic human reality that social scientists call "</span>successive approximations<span>".</span>
Answer: Gain of $12,000
Explanation:
First off, what was the Net book value of the old sailboat?
= Cost Price - Accumulated Depreciation
= 210,000 - 84,000
= $126,000
They paid $101,000 in cash and received a trade in allowance of $138,000 bringing the value to $239,000.
What they should have received as the trade in allowance was the NBV of $126,000. Since they didn't they got a gain of,
= 138,000 - 126,000
= $12,000
Because this transaction has commercial substance, the gain would be $12,000.
Answer:
It will increase by 50%
Explanation:
Equity is given as: credit - short market value.
Find attached below table of solution
