Colonial governments had their own governors who operated with a great degree of independence from the home country's government. They also elected their own legislative assemblies and made their own laws. They could assess and collect their own taxes for purposes they decided upon within the colony itself.
If we take the American colonies as a primary example, the British home government for many years practiced a policy that Edmund Burke later would call "salutary neglect." "Salutary neglect" meant that the British government "neglected" or took a mostly hands-off approach to the colonies, because that was "salutary" or beneficial to the success and profitability of the colonies. Eventually, however, in the mid-18th century, the British government began trying to assert greater governmental control over the colonies, including matters of taxation. This especially happened after the French and Indian War, in an effort to deal with war debt that the British government had incurred. The attempts by the British imperial government to exercise stronger control over the colonies eventually led to the Revolutionary War.
<em>According to G00GLE, and I quote*: " The Minnesota Supreme Court's canon of judicial conduct prohibiting candidates for judicial election from announcing their views on disputed legal and political issues violates the First Amendment. "</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em>* </em><em>thanks to Cornell Law School for the awesome answer, all credit due there. </em>
Explanation:The French and Indian War also had lasting (and devastating) effects for the Native American tribes of North America. The British took retribution against Native American nations that fought on the side of the French by cutting off their supplies and then forcibly compelling the tribes to obey the rules of the new mother country.