Answer:
Neolithic Revolution.
Explanation:
The Neolithic Revolution is a term that refers to the transformation of ancient civilizations from hunter-gatherer societies to societies where people made a living mainly through agriculture and animal husbandry. This is also the change that marked the transition between the older and younger Stone Age. The oldest traces of grain cultivation and animal husbandry are about 11,000 years old, and come from Southwest Asia (the fertile crescent), but an independent development towards agriculture also took place in Central America and China. The term "the Neolithic revolution" refers to the great effect this change had on the organization of the societies that began to cultivate instead of living as hunters and gatherers.
The Italian Renaissance was one of the most productive periods in the history of art, with large numbers of outstanding masters to be found in many centers and in all the major fields painting, sculpture, and architecture. In Florence, in the first half of the fifteenth century, there were great innovators in all these fields, whose work marked a beginning of a new era in the history of art. These innovators included Masaccio in painting, Brunelleschi in architecture, and Donatello in sculpture. Their new ideals and methods were systematized in the theoretical writings of their friend and fellow artist Leon Battista Alberti. There can also be observed in this period a change in the social status of the artist. Heretofore, he had been an artisan, a craftsman. Now the attempt was made to include artists among the practitioners of the "liberal arts," which were regarded as being on a higher level than the "mechanical arts." These efforts bore fruit, and some of the great masters, for example, Titian and Michelangelo, by the force of their genius and personality, were able to achieve a measure of status and respect rarely enjoyed by their predecessors. The idea of artistic genius became popular; Michelangelo was called "divine" because of the greatness of his creative powers.
In the Renaissance, art and science were closely connected. Both the artist and the scientist strove for the mastery of the physical world, and the art of painting profited by two fields of study that may be called scientific: anatomy, which made possible a more accurate representation of the human body, and mathematical perspective. Perspective in painting is the rendering on a two- dimensional surface of the illusion of three dimensions. Previous painters had achieved this effect by empirical means, but the discovery of a mathematical method of attaining a three-dimensional impression is attributed to Brunelleschi in about 1420. Henceforth, the method could be systematically studied and explained, and it became one of the chief instruments of artists, especially painters, in their pursuit of reality. Some men were both artists and scientists, notably Leonardo da Vinci and Piero della Francesca. It is doubtful whether they would have understood our distinction between art and science.
Answer:
The main difference between Athens and Sparta is that Athens was a form of democracy, whereas Sparta was a form of oligarchy. Athens and Sparta are two prominent Greek rival-city states. Athens was the centre for arts, learning and philosophy while Sparta was a warrior state.
Explanation:
Correct answer choice is :
C) Primary source document
Explanation:
In the study of history as an educational rule, the main supply is an object, document, diary, manuscript, life, recording, or the other provide knowledge that was produced at the time below study. It is an inspired supply of knowledge regarding the subject. Although several primary sources stay in camera hands, others are put in information, libraries, museums, historical societies, and special collections. These may be public or non-public. Some are linked with universities and schools, whereas others are government organizations.
They are a sovereign state, that has the authority to tax all bussiness within it´s borders. Later this came to one of the firsts big cases on the Supreme Court, given the fact the it´d set an example for the other states on the possibility of taxing or going agaisnt federal desicions. Eventually the Supreme court would prohibit Maryland from taxing the National bank cause <em>"The power to tax, is the power to destroy".</em>
