1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klasskru [66]
3 years ago
8

Based on the following information, determine the amount of equipment on the balance sheet. Total liabilities and owner's equity

equals $44,750; total current assets equals $19,800; land equals $15,000; and accumulated depreciation—equipment equals $1,550.
Business
2 answers:
hammer [34]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

$9,950

Explanation:

The amount of equipment shall be determined through accounting equation which is given as follows:

Total Assets=Total liabilities+Total equity

Total assets=Current+Non current assets

Current assets+Non current assets=Total liabilities+Total equity

Non current assets=Cost of land+Cost of equipment-accumulated depreciation on equipment

Current assets+Cost of land+Cost of equipment-accumulated depreciation on equipment=Total liabilities+Total equity

Applying given data in the question to the above equation

$19,800+$15,000+Cost of equipment-$1,550=$44,750

$33,250+Cost of equipment=$44,750

Cost of equipment=$44,750-$33,250=$11,500

Amount of equipment on balance sheet=$11,500-$1,550=$9,950

Juli2301 [7.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

$11,500

Explanation:

the basic accounting equation:

assets = liabilities + shareholders' equity

liabilities + shareholders' equity = $44,750, so assets = $44,750

equipment account = total assets - current assets - land + accumulated depreciation

equipment account = $44,750 - $19,800 - $15,000 + $1,550 = $11,500

Accumulated depreciation is a contra-asset account that lowers the current value of the asset (in this case equipment) and is also included in the balance sheet with a credit balance.

You might be interested in
If the discount rate is 21% and the steady growth rate after 3 years is 2%, what should the stock price be today
jonny [76]

<u>Complete Question:</u>

Tattletale News Corp. has been growing at a rate of 20% per year, and you expect this growth rate in earnings and dividends to continue for another 3 years.

a. If the last dividend paid was $10, what will the next dividend be? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

Dividend  $

b. If the discount rate is 21% and the steady growth rate after 3 years is 2%, what should the stock price be today? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

Stock price  $

Answer:

Requirement A. $12 per share

Requirement B. $44.14 per share

Explanation:

Requirement A.

The next dividend can be calculated using the following equation:

Next Dividend = D0 * (1 + g)

Here

D0 is the current dividend which is $10 and g is the Growth Rate which is 20% for the first three years

By putting values, we have:

Next Dividend = $10 * (1 + 20%)

= $12 per share

Requirement B.

Year  Dividend  Growth Rate  New Dividend

1               10                      20%           12

2               12                      20%                 14.40

3                 14.4                     20%         17.28

4            17.28                    2%                   17.63

Stock Price = $17.63 * (1 + 2%) / (21% - 2%) = $94.62

The above stock price calculated is the value of stock at the end of year 4. To discount it back to year zero, we will discount it by 21%.

Stock price at year0 = $94.62 / (1 + 21%)^4 = $44.14 per share

6 0
3 years ago
Fixed cost per unit is inversely proportional to the volume of units produced.
Levart [38]
True. Fixed cost per unit is inversely proportional to the volume of units produced.

Fixed costs per unit are inversely proportional to the volume produced because depending on the amount of units made, the amount spent on fixed costs is then based. Because they are related to one another, this statement is true.  
5 0
3 years ago
Alex Karev has taken out a ​$ loan with an annual rate of percent compounded monthly to pay off hospital bills from his wife​ Iz
Tom [10]

Answer:

the question is incomplete, so I looked for a similar one:

<em>Alex Karev has taken out a ​$180,000 loan with an annual rate of 11% compounded monthly to pay off hospital bills from his wife​ Izzy's illness. If the most Alex can afford to pay is ​$3,500 per​ month, how long will it take to pay off the​ loan? How long will it take for him to pay off the loan if he can pay $4,000 per​ month?</em>

PVIFA = $180,000 / $3,500 = 51.42857

PVIFA = [1 - 1/(1 + i)ⁿ ] / i = [1 - 1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ] / 0.11/12

51.42857 x 0.11/12 = 1 - 1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ

0.47143 = 1 - 1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ

1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ = 1 - 0.47143 = 0.52857

1 / 0.52857 = (1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ

1.89189 = 1.009167ⁿ

n = log 1.89189 / log 1.009167 = 0.2769 / 0.003963 = 69.87

n = 69.87 months

PVIFA = $180,000 / $4,000 = 45

PVIFA = [1 - 1/(1 + i)ⁿ ] / i = [1 - 1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ] / 0.11/12

45 x 0.11/12 = 1 - 1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ

0.4125 = 1 - 1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ

1/(1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ = 1 - 0.4125 = 0.5875

1 / 0.5875 = (1 + 0.11/12)ⁿ

1.70213 = 1.009167ⁿ

n = log 1.70213 / log 1.009167 = 0.23099 / 0.003963 = 58.29

n = 58.29 months

4 0
3 years ago
When is a goodwill impairment loss recognized? a. Annually on a systematic and rational basis. b. Never When both the fair value
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": When both the fair value of a reporting unit and its associated implied goodwill fall below their respective carrying values.

Explanation:

Impairment Loss is the decrease in an asset's net carrying value that exceeds the future undisclosed cash flow it should generate. The net carrying value is an asset's acquisition cost minus depreciation. Impairment occurs when a company sells or abandons an asset that is no longer beneficial.

Thus, <em>a goodwill impairment loss is recognized when the goodwill's net carrying value is below its fair value and the expected cash flow it was to generate.</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT an assumption that economists make when developing a production possibilities frontier (PPF)?
marta [7]

Answer:

Option D

Explanation:

Because it is not one of the key assumption underlying ppf

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which purchase would lead to decreasing marginal utility?
    7·1 answer
  • William, irene, jason, barbara, and immunographics, inc., form a partnership for the purposes of developing designs for medical
    8·1 answer
  • Effect in the accounting equation when cash dividends are declared
    13·1 answer
  • Larry is in charge of collecting customer service and satisfaction data for his company. He’s not sure which key groups in the c
    9·1 answer
  • What is a great example of using cluster analysis in business to create target-marketing strategies?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following actions would improve your credit score?
    12·2 answers
  • Round Wheels, Inc. purchased a patent for $730,000, and a trademark for $320,000. Round Wheels, Inc. amortizes intangible assets
    11·1 answer
  • Which step in the product development process involves announcing a new
    11·1 answer
  • Piedmont Company segments its business into two regions - North and South.
    12·1 answer
  • In each of the following situations, indicate whether the 50% reduction for meals applies.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!