Answer:
Osiris is the right answer.
Explanation:
In Ancient Egyptian mythology, Osiris was the god of the living and the dead. He has also been regarded as the Judge of the Dead. He is considered to be the eldest of all children of god Geb and Goddess Nut. He was given an epithet "Khenti-Amentiu" in reference to his royality to the land of the dead. Though it is believed that his worship began a long time before the first evidence for his worship is found in the rule of the Fifth Dynasty of Egypt.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Well,
Let's just say that the Jaguar! (a certain ride in Knott's) could instantly go from zero speed to, let's say, 40 mph, and vice versa. We know (if you have ridden it) that the Jaguar! is not a straight line, as you can't say that it is always traveling at 40 mph due north (otherwise it would never be able to make a loop)!
Remember that, since velocity is a vector quantity, a change in direction will constitute a change in velocity.
I’m pretty sure the answer is D :)
Answer:
This is law of effect.
Explanation:
The "law of effect" is a principle developed by "Edward Thorndike". It is the principle on behavioral conditioning, which means that if a response has a pleasing effect are likely to occur again. And if a reaction doesn’t produce satisfying effect would have less frequency in future. For example, if an employee is praised by the boss for starting his work early, it is likely that the employee’s behavior will repeat in future.
Thus, the given statement is law of effect.
