Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The maths teacher because it was the first day back but he was giving a ‘miD YeAr tEsT’
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
Answer:
<h3>
x = 6 ft. long shadow</h3><h3>
</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
its a ratio and proportion:
<u> 15 ft. tall giraffe </u> = <u> 5 ft. tall bird </u>
18 ft. shadow x shadow
15 (x) = 18 (5)
x = 90 / 15
x = 6 ft. long shadow
Answer:
f(x) = 2^(2x+1)
Step-by-step explanation:
2 = 2¹
8 = 2³
32 = 2⁵
128 = 2⁷
1,3,5 and 7 are odd numbers.
Individual numbers in mathematics are represented as 2x + 1.