When someone contacts you by phone or email and requests personal information that they can use to steal your identity, this is known as identity theft. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is identity theft?</h3>
Generally, To commit the crime of identity theft, also known as identity fraud, an impostor must first collect significant pieces of personally identifiable information (PII), such as a person's Social Security number or driver's license number, in order to assume the identity of another person.
In conclusion, It is referred to as identity theft when a person approaches you by phone or email in order to obtain personal information that they may use to steal your identity and utilize it for their own benefit.
Read more about identity theft.
brainly.com/question/17112484
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is: <span>concrete operational
During the concrete operational stage, the children already started to develop the congitive ability to perform logical thinking.
This would granted them the ability for basic reasoning in determining the causal-effect relationship in a certain event</span>
Members of congress enjoy two kinds of privileges:
- when congress is in session they cannot be arrested for specific crimes (except for Treason, Felony and Breach of Peace)
- they can deduce 3000 dollars from taxes to cover their expenses of living away from home.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that all forms of advertising have a common goal; to influence people's opinions and behavior is always the reason behind any form of advertisement, be it the one which is meant to sell something or promote a cause, they all have a common goal: to influence people's opinions and behavior.
So the totality of why people advise their products or bring out information about their services can be summarised in that line.
Any form of advertisement which is not influencing the behaviour of people and their opinion has failed in its function.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
