Answer:
c.credit to Wages Payable for $6,300.
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the wages expense is shown below;
Wages expense dr ($10,500 × 3 ÷ 5) $6,300
To Wages payable $6,300
(being the wages expense is recorded)
Here the wages expense is debited as it increased the expense and credited the wages payable as it increased the liabilities
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Emails show an agreement between the defendant and the plaintiff and as long as they are proved to be actually between the parties, it is considered evidence.
Answer:
10.9%
Explanation:
to calculate the expected return of the portfolio, we first need to calculate the portfolio's beta:
the portfolio beta = (beta UPS stock x weight UPS stock) + (beta Walmart stock x weight Walmart) = (1.4 x 50%) + (0.9 x 50%) = 0.7 + 0.45 = 1.15
portfolio's expected return = risk free rate + (portfolio beta x market risk premium) = 4% + (1.15 x 6%) = 4% + 6.9% = 10.9%
120 per week, per dish washer
240 per week for employed dishwashers
3,000/240
12.5 weeks
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
