That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
Sensitive issues refer to topics which people tend to feel uncomfortable talking about (Like harassment, addictions, violence)
Many studies on this topic have shown that when people are in front of other person who's interviewing them they might hide some aspects of themselves to create a better impression on the interviewer, therefore, the information acquired this way is not 100% right.
Regarding <u>sensitive issues, it is even more difficult for people to talk about them specially when it comes to an stranger</u> (like a researcher). Thus, it is not recommended to address sensitive issues in interviews but rather by <u>self-administered questionnaires in which the person doesn't have to interact with another person.</u>
<u />
When it comes to complicated issues, a questionnaire is not recommended since it could leave the researcher without enough information, and since it's <u>a complicated issue, the researcher might want to be there to clarify people's answers.</u> Therefore, <u>for complicated issues, it is better to use interviews.</u>
Thus, the correct answer is b) Use self-administered questionnaires for sensitive issues and interviews for complicated issues
I agree with these perspectives on the grounds that there are a few situations where an individual planned to follow up on a good aim however the result wasn't right and here and there an individual expect to act awful after something and the activity ended up being great. My point is that occasionally unexpected things can happen and cause a change to a condition that we have no power in. I trust that an individual ought to be judged in light of their expectations, not their activities.
Answer:
yes, an observer can see eclipses
Explanation:
yes, an observer can see eclipses
we eclipse is appearance of the planet or the Moon that is pass between observer and some other object that give light
so if we will be on Jupiter planet
and we know Jupiter planet moon create eclipses because we will be on the equatorial plane
and we need the planet that has a moon and that is on its equatorial plane to have an eclipse
so as that we can see
Answer:
Dion was motivated by his self-concept, and his need to be consistent with it. According to Carl Rogers, we are driven by a perception of who we are and the values that shape us. When our actions don't correspond with these values, we might feel a sense of discomfort which Rogers called "incongruence".
