With reference to the strange situation experiment conducted by Mary Ainsworth, option(a) insecure-resistant i.e, infants cannot be comforted by the mother during the reunion and show difficulty in returning to play.
<h3>
Who was Mary Ainsworth?</h3>
American-Canadian developmental psychologist Mary Dinsmore Ainsworth is renowned for her contributions to the creation of the attachment theory. To study early emotional attachment between a kid and its primary caregiver, she created the weird circumstance process.
The "Strange Situation" laboratory technique is the original approach, created by renowned psychologist Mary Ainsworth (Ainsworth et al 1978). It examines how infants or young children react when their mothers are temporarily absent. The Strange Situation is a semi-structured laboratory approach that enables us to recognize newborns who successfully use a primary caregiver on a secure basis without requiring extensive home monitoring.
To know more about Mary Ainsworth refer to: brainly.com/question/15302766
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
With reference to the strange situation experiment conducted by Mary Ainsworth, ________________ infants cannot be comforted by the mother on reunion and show difficulty in returning to play.
A. insecure-resistant
B. insecure-avoidant
C. insecure-disorganized
D. insecure-disoriented
I would say A. because it’s the only one that clarifies of what a locomotive really is.
Szasz points to how people have learned the deviant or odd behaviors instead of hidden psychological causes. Seeing as Dr. Szasz felt that psychological underpinnings were of less value than the actual behaviors (i.e., he argued that there were no objective tests for designating a DSM diagnosis), the more important concept to be understood was <span><u>why the person learned to behave as they did.</u></span>
Answer:
A. Middle adulthood
Explanation:
Traditionally, middle adulthood is a period of maturing, after the naive and indolent years of youthfulness and early adulthood. At this moment of life, the person began to seek stability in his or her life, attempting to secure the future, and avoiding problems and excessive behaviors.
Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
