1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
3 years ago
7

Based on your case knowledge, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement - "Kay Whitmore - Kodak CEO,

had an understanding of Kodak's potential in the PC market. This was illustrated by her strong engagement with Bill Gates and Microsoft."
1. Strongly Agree
2. Mildly Agree
3. Neither Agree nor Disagree
4. MIldly Disagree
5. Strongly Disagree
6. Not Applicable
Business
1 answer:
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

3. Neither Agree nor Disagree

Explanation:

The reason was that the Kay Whitmore's engagement with Bill Gates and Microsoft has not much impacts on the potential of Kodak's products to exploit additional opportunities in Microsoft hence statement in consideration is not a one side argument as it is doubtful position.

So I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the statement hence the option 3 is correct here.

You might be interested in
While it may not be possible to make the receiver happy when you deliver bad news, you can reduce bad feelings by structuring yo
Sever21 [200]

Answer: Facts

Explanation:

With regards to the information given, the buffering technique that is being used when one provides the objective information in the opening is referred to as facts.

When an opening is buffered by including facts, one has to introduce the bad news with the objective information. It should be noted that the buffer should be concise and relevant.

5 0
3 years ago
The Economic Order Quantity is when: holding costs equal ordering costs total costs are minimized the product cost is not consid
Levart [38]

Answer:  all of the above

Explanation:

At the Economic Order Quantity level, the company is enjoying the lowest cost possible in relation to product ordering and storage because they are ordering just enough quantities that they are able to sell them just in time to order some new goods.

For this to happen, the holding cost must be equal to the ordering costs. At the EOQ, the product cost is irrelevant when the quantity to be bought is to be determined because it is minimized.

3 0
3 years ago
Libby Company purchased equipment by paying $5,000 cash on the purchase date and agreeing to pay $5,000 every six months during
Nat2105 [25]

Answer: $38,664

Explanation:

To solve this we shall use the Present Value of an Annuity Formula because the cost is the present value of all the payments.

The formula is as follows,

PV of an Annuity = C [ (1 – (1+i)^-n) / i ]

Where,

C is the cash flow per period

i is the rate of interest

n is the frequency of payments

They'll be paying twice a year for 4 years so n = 8

Since it is semi annually, the rate should be 8%/2, = 4%

Calculating we have,

= 5,000 ( 1 - ( 1 + 4%) ^-8 ) / 4%)

=$ 33,663.72

Then we add the $5,000 on purchase day to get,

= 5,000 + 33,663.72

= 38,663.72

= $38,664

The equipment reported on the balance sheet as of the purchase date is closest to $38,664

8 0
3 years ago
What is the cost of going kayaking in this case? Check all that apply. a.The value of your time spent studying b.The rental of a
stepladder [879]

Answer:

a. b. and d.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the cost of going kayaking would be everything that is being taken from you by deciding to go kayaking. Which in this case would be all the money used on getting into the national park and renting the needed equipment. Also the value of the time spent studying since you are giving that up in order to go kayaking.

8 0
3 years ago
You are examining two different MMMFs. Fund A is tax-exempt and pays 5%. Fund B is taxable and pays 6%. You live in a state that
Radda [10]

Answer:

Two Different MMMFs

The tax rate to produce identical yields is 16.67%

Explanation:

For Fund A & B to produce identical yields:

Fund's A yield of 5% must equal Fund B's 6% (1 - 0.28).

Therefore, 5% = 6% (1 - tax rate)

Let (1 - tax rate) be x.

That is 0.05 = 0.06x

x = 0.05/0.06 = 0.8333

Therefore, (1 - tax rate) = 0.8333

Tax rate = 1 - 0.8333

Tax rate = 0.1667

<u>Check: if 5% = 6% (1 - tax rate)</u>

0.05 = 0.06 (1 - 0.1667)

0.05 = 0.049998

0.05 = 0.05

The above calculation shows that if Fund B is taxed at 16.67% instead of 28%, it would have identical yields with Fund A.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe markings on a road that indicate that it is safe to pass. (What type and color of marking)
    14·1 answer
  • The fact that financial services are more plentiful and easier to access means that
    14·1 answer
  • Katherine gives piano lessons for $20 per hour. She also grows flowers, which she arranges and sells at the local farmer’s marke
    14·1 answer
  • The use of communication technologies such as videoconferencing and networks has enabled increased
    14·2 answers
  • Should Elon Musk be the man in charge of Tesla? plz leave ur opinion
    7·2 answers
  • Lopez Corporation incurred the following costs while manufacturing its product.Materials used in product $120,000 Advertising ex
    6·1 answer
  • Castillo Company has a defined benefit pension plan. At the end of the reporting year, the following data were available: beginn
    7·1 answer
  • Alphabet Company, which uses the periodic inventory method, purchases different letters for resale. Alphabet had no beginning in
    15·1 answer
  • The average individual in a country earns an annual salary of $60,000, of which $24,000 is spent on housing, $10,800 on food, $1
    12·1 answer
  • Perdon Corporation manufactures safes-large mobile safes, and large walk-in stationary bank safes. As part of its annual budgeti
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!