Found this on the web hope it helps!
I got you boo <3
I recommend using the wordtune addon for chrome.
I'll give ya 2 examples
"No one mentioned such things; it was not a rule, but was considered rude to call attention to things that were unsettling or different about individuals." -Chapter 3
Boom so loss of individualism is an element of dystopian literature. Being unique is what makes you a human and in the Giver, they try to take away that.
"It's the way they live. It's the life that was created for them. It's the same life that you would have if you had not been chosen as my successor." -Chap 20
Sounds like a totalitarian goverment to me! Life with no options and only choices made for you by higher-ups sounds like loss of individualism too!
<h3>Godfrey, having returned from his walk, tells Nancy some truly shocking news: Dunstan's remains have been found at the bottom of the drained stone-pits. With Dunstan's body, Marner's gold has been recovered. Godfrey also makes another painful revelation. He finally tells Nancy that the woman found dead in the snow outside of Marner's cottage sixteen years before was his own wife, and that Eppie is his biological child.
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Nancy hears this news with surprising calmness. She tells Godfrey that if he had only worked up the courage to tell her this news six years ago, when he was so eager to adopt Eppie, she would have supported him wholeheartedly. Better yet, she could have married him knowing that Godfrey had a daughter, and she could have raised Eppie as her own child. Thus Godfrey finally feels the full weight of his error. In failing to trust his wife, not only did he live without Eppie, he lived without ever knowing the woman he married.</h3>
Answer:Part A: Fear can shape how we act.
Part B: "Whenever it fell upon me, my blood ran cold; and so by degrees-- very gradually-- I made up my mind to take the life of the old man, and thus rid myself of the evil eye forever
Explanation:THIS IS FOR PART A AND PART B
Answer:
Explanation:
Today I will be analyzing an Australian Political cartoon targeting a current issue- Tony Abbott and his Asylum seeker policy
I have chosen a relevant cartoon by Cathy Wilcox, published in the Sydney Morning Herald on the 22nd of December 2013. I’ll firstly outline the cartoon’s contextual information, after which I’ll explore the satirical elements used by Wilcox to persuade the readers of her perspective. Finishing with an evaluation of the cartoons effectiveness.
Firstly, to the context of this cartoon. The cartoon addresses the desperate and dangerous situation of asylum seekers arriving by boat to Australia. Wilcox tries to convey Abbott’s…show more content…
Secondly, Wilcox uses incongruity through visual elements to further her views. Incongruity is most evident when focusing on the man selling lottery tickets to the refugees, with the prize being accepted into Australia. This lottery concept is bizarrely, yet intentionally associated with the refugees, highlighting how they are manipulated with false promises. The facial expressions and symbols used enhance the cartoon’s incongruity. The ticket seller’s immensely large grin suggests there is more to this lottery offer than meets the eye, alongside his remark “Get your lottery tickets here!” an unusual phrase to hear in refugee areas. The sign written with Australia, $5000…. states the price of a lottery ticket though the ellipses imply that a greater cost is involved. They are gambling with money as well as taking big risks with their lives with no guarantee of safely reaching Australia. The refugees’ anxious expressions show their realization of the dangers but their disparity forces them to take these risks. Finally, to the effectiveness of this cartoon.
