Answer:
1. Fish in private stream (rival/Excludable). Fish in River (rival/non Excludable)
2. Fish in Private stream (private good). Fish in River (common resource)
3. Tragedy of commons
Explanation:
1. The fish in the private stream are Rival in consumption and Excludable while the fish in the river are Rival in consumption and Non- Excludable
2. The fish in the private stream is a private good, the fish in the river is a common resource.
A private good must be purchased to be consumed. Consumption by one person prevents another person from consuming it hence it is rival and Excludable. A common resource like the river benefits all individuals because it is not owned by any one individual. A common resource stands the risk of depletion and over consumption.
3. Fishing in the river will lead to tragedy of the commons because anyone can fish in the river, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success.
The answer to the question is "It would be probably high".
If you get your first credit card while you are a full-time student, what you can expect about the card's ARP (Annual Rate Percentage) on outstanding balances is would be probably high.
Answer:
The answer is "In the <u>classical</u> view, there are ample loanable funds available at the current interest rate. When G increases, no crowding out occurs, interest rates do not rise, and aggregate expenditures rise by the full amount of G."
Explanation:
In the classical view, the capital market will find the balance between the demanded investment quality and the supplied savings one itself. However, in the Keynesian view, for example during a recession, government spending (G) will increase and there will be a competition to acquire available capital supply, that leads to the crowding out occurs and the general interest rate increases.
The answer is D hope this helped
Answer:
c. Shareholder agency costs include the opportunity costs associated with constraining managerialfreedom but do not include managerial salaries.
Explanation:
"Agency costs usually refers to the conflicts between shareholders and their company's managers. A shareholder wants the manager to make decisions which will increase the share value. Managers, instead, would prefer to expand the business and increase their salaries, which may not necesarrily increase share value."
Reference: InvestingAnswers. “Agency Costs.” InvestingAnswers, 2019