1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlladinOne [14]
3 years ago
15

How did Chandragupta improve life during the mauryan empire

History
2 answers:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
7 0

Chandragupta improved business and trade.

Chandragupta I was a king of the Gupta dynasty, who ruled in northern India.  

From 322 to 185 BCE, the Mauryan dynasty ruled over much of what is now India. The Maurya Empire was led by the Mauryan dynasty. It constituted a geographically extensive and powerful political and military empire in ancient India.The empire stemmed from the kingdom of Magadha.

leva [86]3 years ago
6 0
He improved business and trade.

hope i helped
You might be interested in
Why were the 1920s harder for farmers than they were for the rest of the country?
natka813 [3]

Answer:

(B) Farmers had to buy expensive new machinery while making less money off falling food prices

Explanation:

The major reason 1920s was harder for farmers than they were for the rest of the country is that farmers had to buy very costly machinery to work on their various farms despite making less money or very small returns off falling food prices. Other factors that contributed to farmers hardship in the 1920s was also the crash of the stock market in the year 1929.

However, Some new deal initiative spring forth to assist farmers in minimizing the hardship witnessed by them.

One of the initiative is :

1) AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ADMINISTRATION : This initiative was geared towards creating artificial scarcity by the farmers which subsequently leads to increase in the prices of available farm produce.

7 0
4 years ago
The federal regulation of lobbying act of 1946 was __________ by the supreme court.
Leviafan [203]
<span>Upheld by the Supreme Court in the case of United States v Harriss, 347 U.S. 612. In this case, the Supreme Court held that the act was not unconstitutionally vague or unclear. However, the Court did narrow who the act applied to, specifically full time, paid lobbyists who interact directly with representatives, not just staffers.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Aquinas based his writings upon the arguments of what two men?
n200080 [17]
B) Augustine

D) Aristotle
8 0
3 years ago
This is World history
Pepsi [2]
D. Optimal Rainfall
5 0
3 years ago
Do you think having laws that apply to everyone benefit civilization?
olasank [31]
Yes because is there was no law there would be no civilization
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the view that the British had toward the wealthy Colonists and compare that to how the wealthy Colonists viewed the "co
    11·1 answer
  • Leader of north vietnam during vietnam war
    13·1 answer
  • Explain how Rome’s treatment of conquered people furthered unity in their vast empire
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Kings and priests of Sumer support one another ?
    14·1 answer
  • How did politics effect the economy?
    15·1 answer
  • After the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, President Johnson
    10·2 answers
  • Do you think states should have the right to nullify, or ignore laws the
    14·1 answer
  • List down some reforms and developments brought during 2ndkings reign​
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Mexican Americans lose rights to their land?
    12·2 answers
  • Why are countries interdependent?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!