Answer:
The correct answer is (b)
Explanation:
Interpretive research is based on predicting and analysing consumer behaviour based on the socio-historic context. This is an old technique to use historic data to predict human behaviour which is not feasible to apply in today's world because people, their living styles everything has changed. Now, researchers try to predict a phenomenon and consumer behaviour by talking to them rather analysing in a socio-historic context.
The Hawthorne studies found that employees in the experimental group WERE MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN OTHER EMPLOYEES AND IT DOES NOT DEPEND UPON THE LEVEL OF LIGHTING.
The Hawthorne studies was conducted by Elton Mayo and his colleagues to determine the level of illumination and its relationship with the productivity.
Answer:
14.05%
Explanation:
Given that,
Beta = 1.3
Risk-free rate (Rf) = 9.5%
Return on the Market (RM) = 13%
According to CAPM approach:
Cost of common equity (RE):
= [Rf + β (RM – Rf)]
= [9.5% + 1.3 (13% - 9.5%)]
= [9.5% + 1.3 (3.5%)]
= [0.095 + 1.3 (0.035)]
= [0.095 + 0.0455]
= 0.1405
= 14.05%
Therefore, the firm's cost of common equity is 14.05%.
A company had net income of $40,000, net sales of $300,000, and average total assets of $200,000. The profit margin and total asset turnover ratio are 13.3% each. 1.5.
There are two methods that can be used to calculate return on assets. The first method is to divide the company's net income by its average total assets. The second method is to multiply the company's net profit margin by sales.
Return on assets is calculated by dividing a company's after-tax earnings by total assets. The balance sheet total corresponds to the company's total equity and liabilities. This value can be found on the company's balance sheet.
Learn more about assets at
brainly.com/question/25746199
#SPJ4
Answer:
If Jenny doesn’t earn any interest on her savings and wants to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, how much will she consume every year?
Jenny's total income during her life = income as tax analyst ($60,000 x 10) + income as PhD student ($12,000 x 5) + income as Art Director (35 x $95,000) = $3,985,000
she generated income during 50 years and expects to live 20 more, so in order to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, she must divide her total life income by 70 years = $3,985,000 / 70 years = $56,928.57 per year
What might prevent her from perfectly smoothing consumption?
First of all, besides inflation, you also earn interest on your savings. That is why 401k and other retirement accounts work so well (the magic of compound interest). Even if inflation and interests didn't exist, you cannot know exactly what you are going to earn in the future and for how many years. In this case, she earned $60,000 for 10 years, but then earned only $12,000 during 5 years. If she really wanted to smooth her consumption, she would have needed to get a loan because her savings during the first 10 years wouldn't be enough.
