Answer:
Answer explained below
Explanation:
decrease in consumer surplus = 0.5(initial number of bottles - final number)*(final price-initial price) + (final price-initial price)*(final number)
where initial number of bottles = 25
final number of bottles = 15
initial price = $390
final price = $390
substituting these values, we have
- decrease in consumer surplus = 0.5(25-15)(450-390) + (450-390)15 = 1200
Consumer surplus decreases by 1200
- Consumers will buy the good as long as marginal benefit is greater than or equal price.
Thus quantity demanded will be 2 from the table
Consumer surplus = 240- market price = 240 -220= 20
Consumers total benefit = 220*quantity demanded = 220*2= 440
Answer:
(a) 3.7
(b) 3.7
Explanation:
The unemployment rate is calculated as the ration of unemployed workers over the labor force. The labor force is the total number of employed plus unemployed workers:
Then if there were 155 million people in the labor force and 7.4% where unemployed that means that 11.47 million people where unemployed
If unemployment rate would have been 5% we have
That means that 3.72 million fewer unemployed workers. Since Labor Force is the sum of unemployed and employed workers. The reduction in unemployment implies that they were now employed .
Answer:
A. To keep banks with falling asset values solvent.
Explanation:
When a bank is failing it will result in loss of funds not only for the bank but also for customers that have accounts in these banks.
If a bank eventually closes operations as a result of insolvency, they will not be able to pay off the customers. That is where the deposit insurance comes in to settle customers.
The government will have to spend a lot of money reimbursing customers their money.
To avoid this the federal government ensures the capital of banks is maintained to keep banks with falling asset values solvent.
<span>In the past ten years, the largest amount of growth has been seen in the expenditure on services. For example, in the period 2014-5, that expenditure grew by 3.4%. Comparatively, the other components of household expenditure showed relatively modest differential gains during the last 10-year period.</span>
Answer:
Reward-to-risk ratio Y =7.54%
Reward-to-risk ratio Z = 5.43%
Since the SML reward-to-risk is 6.8%
Stock Y is Undervalued
Stock Z Overvalued
Explanation:
Calculation for the reward-to-risk ratios for stocks Y is 7.54% and Z is 5.43% respectively.
Reward-to-risk ratio Y = (15.3%-5.5%)/1.3
Reward-to-risk ratio Y =7.54%
Reward-to-risk ratio Z = (9.3%-5.5%)/0.7 =
Reward-to-risk ratio Z = 5.43%
Therefore the reward-to-risk ratios for stocks Y and Z are and percent, respectively
Since the SML reward-to-risk is 6.8%
Stock Y is undervalued while Stock Stock Z on the other hand is overvalued reason been that
Reward-to-risk ratio Y is high while the Reward-to-risk ratio is low .
