Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
Answer:
$500 million
Explanation:
The solution of the money supply and its effect is here below:-
Decrease in money supply = $50 million ÷ reserve ratio
= $50 million ÷ 10%
= $500 million
If $50 million were used to repay loans, that will have raised money supply. Thus, buying $50 million in government securities from the fed reduces the supply of capital.
Answer:
D they both will increase
Explanation:
Goodluck on that.
1:People have too much money, and there is a danger of inflation. - <span>B contractionary fiscal policy
</span><span>
2:The GDP has fallen to an all-time low, and there is low demand for most goods. - </span><span>D:expansionary fiscal policy
</span><span>
3:Few farmers produce cotton because profits are at the equilibrium price. - </span><span>A:price floor
</span><span>
4:Prices of staple foods have shot up because of shortages after an earthquake. - </span>C:price ceiling
Less money up front equals it to be better than renting an appartment