1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vivado [14]
3 years ago
15

Consider the arguments over the expansion of slavery made by both northerners and southerners in the aftermath of the U.S. victo

ry over Mexico. Who had the more compelling case? Or did each side make equally significant arguments?
History
2 answers:
Sedaia [141]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The election of 1848 did nothing to quell the controversy over whether slavery would advance into the Mexican Cession. Some slaveholders, like President Taylor, considered the question a moot point because the lands acquired from Mexico were far too dry for growing cotton and therefore, they thought, no slaveholder would want to move there. Other southerners, however, argued that the question was not whether slaveholders would want to move to the lands of the Mexican Cession, but whether they could and still retain control of their slave property. Denying them the right to freely relocate with their lawful property was, they maintained, unfair and unconstitutional. Northerners argued, just as fervidly, that because Mexico had abolished slavery, no slaves currently lived in the Mexican Cession, and to introduce slavery there would extend it to a new territory, thus furthering the institution and giving the Slave Power more control over the United States. The strong current of antislavery sentiment—that is, the desire to protect white labor—only increased the opposition to the expansion of slavery into the West.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!!

sesenic [268]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In those years, the struggle of Northerns and Southerns relied on the control of Congress. Neither side wanted to give up positions and that is why the decision of admitting Texas to the Union was so important. It would be redundant to say that Southern states wanted Texas to enter as a slave state and Northerners wanted it to enter as a nonslave state. For instance, the Wilmot Proviso by David Wilmot (Congressmen from Pennsylvania) prohibited slavery in the new region. Then it came the Compromise of 1850 that admitted California as a free state. And problems, differences and argues increased.

Texas would finally be admitted as a slave state. The Republic of Texas existed from 1836 to 1845 before Texas joined the United States. Besides the likelihood of war with México, annexation took so long because Texas would be admitted as a slave state and all the debated that it generated between the North and the South. Texas was admitted to the Union as a slave state on December 29, 1845.

You might be interested in
Which of the following was one of Triple Entente until 1917?
aev [14]
France, England, and Russia.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is a potential barrier to efficiency?
Stels [109]

The correct answer is "Resignation."

What is a potential barrier to efficiency is "Resignation."

> It is not "Direction," because it provides the path to move to the desired place the organization wants to arrive.

> It is not "prediction," because it is a forecast of possible scenarios to be faced in the near future.

> It is not "Deliberation" because deliberation allows people to express their arguments in order to come up with a solution.

> That is why the correct answer is "Resignation."

> Resignation makes people assume a comfortable position in the company and they refrain to make their best effort.

> Let's have in mind that efficiency is "to make more with less."

> Efficiency is a key component to be effective in the corporate world.

We can conclude that to be efficient, employers need to be trained and constantly motivated to perform at the best of their capabilities. Otherwise, one of the risks is they can assume an attitude of resignation.

Learn more about this topic here:

brainly.com/question/20560983?referrer=searchResults

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1915 the Central Powers Alliance was made up of what countries?
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

It consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
2.
DaniilM [7]
B:the language is simpler.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes how the Internet can indirectly eliminate the electoral college?
Debora [2.8K]
The option that best describes how the internet can indirectly eliminate the electoral college is c. The electoral college accepts all people but is lagging behind in technology.

Hope this helped :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The articles of confederation were?
    6·2 answers
  • China sells more to other countries than it buys from them. So, China's exports are greater than its imports. This means that Ch
    10·2 answers
  • What is the location continuum of Israel
    8·2 answers
  • Help pleaseeeeeee!!!​
    5·2 answers
  • 5. What was one of the key terms of the Treaty of Paris?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the impact of the smith act?
    10·2 answers
  • When did jack London die?
    13·2 answers
  • Define each word :
    12·1 answer
  • Summarize the role of Europeans, Arabs, and African monarchies in the African Slave Trade.
    5·2 answers
  • What was a belief shared by many Enlightenment philosophers?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!