1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vivado [14]
3 years ago
15

Consider the arguments over the expansion of slavery made by both northerners and southerners in the aftermath of the U.S. victo

ry over Mexico. Who had the more compelling case? Or did each side make equally significant arguments?
History
2 answers:
Sedaia [141]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The election of 1848 did nothing to quell the controversy over whether slavery would advance into the Mexican Cession. Some slaveholders, like President Taylor, considered the question a moot point because the lands acquired from Mexico were far too dry for growing cotton and therefore, they thought, no slaveholder would want to move there. Other southerners, however, argued that the question was not whether slaveholders would want to move to the lands of the Mexican Cession, but whether they could and still retain control of their slave property. Denying them the right to freely relocate with their lawful property was, they maintained, unfair and unconstitutional. Northerners argued, just as fervidly, that because Mexico had abolished slavery, no slaves currently lived in the Mexican Cession, and to introduce slavery there would extend it to a new territory, thus furthering the institution and giving the Slave Power more control over the United States. The strong current of antislavery sentiment—that is, the desire to protect white labor—only increased the opposition to the expansion of slavery into the West.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!!

sesenic [268]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In those years, the struggle of Northerns and Southerns relied on the control of Congress. Neither side wanted to give up positions and that is why the decision of admitting Texas to the Union was so important. It would be redundant to say that Southern states wanted Texas to enter as a slave state and Northerners wanted it to enter as a nonslave state. For instance, the Wilmot Proviso by David Wilmot (Congressmen from Pennsylvania) prohibited slavery in the new region. Then it came the Compromise of 1850 that admitted California as a free state. And problems, differences and argues increased.

Texas would finally be admitted as a slave state. The Republic of Texas existed from 1836 to 1845 before Texas joined the United States. Besides the likelihood of war with México, annexation took so long because Texas would be admitted as a slave state and all the debated that it generated between the North and the South. Texas was admitted to the Union as a slave state on December 29, 1845.

You might be interested in
What is citizenship?
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

A citizenship is having the status of being a citizen. If you have a citizenship in your country you have the right to live there,work,vote, and pay taxes.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When did slavery begin in Texas?
Nana76 [90]

Texas submitted its statehood application only 16 years before the Civil War, and it was admitted to the Union in 1845 as a slave state.

Who introduced slavery to Texas?

  • By 1860, there were 182,566 more people. White families from the south of the United States brought the majority of the slaves to Texas. Some slaves were acquired through the New Orleans-based domestic slave trade.
  • The final American state where slaves were used as property was Texas. The "Peculiar Institution," as Southerners referred to it, expanded throughout the eastern two-fifths of the state in the less than fifty years between 1821 and 1865, covering a region that was almost as big as Alabama and Mississippi put together.
  • When Texas went through its revolution in 1836, there were only about 5,000 slaves; but, by the time the state was annexed into the United States in 1845, there were 30,000 slaves. Statehood and Slavery (1845–1865): Texas submitted its statehood application in 1845, just 16 years before the Civil War, and was admitted to the Union as a slave state.    

To learn more about slaves to Texas refer to:

brainly.com/question/6674810

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the places were subject to the German method of blitzkrieg ?
Masja [62]
The First place was Poland! hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
What did the United States do in response to Japan's invasion of French Indochina?
Eva8 [605]
As a response to Japan's invasion of French Indochina, the United States "<span>D. froze all of Japan's financial assets in the United States," since it was thought that this would put enough pressure on the Japanese to release their "grip" on the region. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
How long does it take to sail from japan to california?
levacccp [35]
About 10 to 14 days depends where in Japan or california
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did communism spread?
    10·2 answers
  • What were some factors that encouraged industrialization in the united states?
    14·1 answer
  • About half of new york city's population fled when the british occupied the city.
    14·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP ASAPPPPP!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Why was Kenya at war in the Shifta War
    13·2 answers
  • In the game of economics which of the following players use goods and services
    10·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Please help
    10·2 answers
  • Which country acquired French Guiana? <br> Portugal<br> Spain<br> France<br> Great <br> Britain
    7·2 answers
  • What was not a reason that the Industrial Revolution began in England?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!