Answer:
1. They became angry
2. They protested
3. They boycotted British goods
4. They revolted
Explanation:
Answer:
allowing more people to own cars.
encouraging city workers to commute.
increasing the price of gasoline. (This is incorrect.)
allowing goods to be shipped farther.
The correct answer is <span>North of 36/30' parallel, which is actually the </span>southern boundary of Missouri
<u>Which method was more effective in containment? Why?</u>
The Marshall Plan was an example of using financial resources to stop the spread of communism.
Approved by Henry Truman in 1943, the Marshall Plan was a far more effective method in containment because of the following reasons:
- Firstly, it was a subtle method to contain the spread of communism through the USSR disguised as a "plan" to help Western Europe and its decreased economy through loans.
- Secondly, it was a peaceful method that didn't result in devastation as the Korean War.
- Thirdly, it was perceived as a "miracle" and the US gained recognition for their efforts, as well as increasing their own economy.
- Furthermore, through the US' humanitarian efforts it tried to implicitly change the beliefs of the Western European people towards a non-communist political system, for which the Marshall Plan succeeded in the subsequent years.
Laissez-faire economics and tariffs--the 1920s presidents supported a hands-off approach to the economy and taxes on imported goods.
Conservatives believe the government should not regulate the economy and allow it to grow as needed. They were more pro-business than worker, limited support for unions. Tariffs were passed in the 1920s to promote American business instead of foreign imports.
