Den
dun
dune
dud
end
ed
er
en
eh
nerd
red
run
Answer:
The strengths of excluding other groups gave black people a stronger voice for what they wanted and not what other groups think they wanted. Black people were able to express themselves more comfortably this way. While when other groups were included, they were able to share their opinions and feel included, especially if they supported what black people were doing.
The weaknesses of excluding other groups could have made other minorities (Asian, Native American, etc.) feel as if they were not as worthy of being heard. White people may have felt a certain way about not being able to express and spread their sympathy with the black folk.
Involving everyone was an effective tactic. Even if some people were not black, it let them express their disapproval of segregation and it showed the nation that not all white people were racist and believed the nation should be split.
William Wilberforce continued to work for the abolition of all slavery within the British Colonies. He joined the 'Society for Gradual Abolition' and, when the campaign intensified again in the 1820's and 30', he did as much as his failing health would allow.
After the Civil War ended, African Americans had to work for <u>White landowners.</u>
<h3>African Americans after Civil War</h3>
- Had little education.
- Had little to no property in the South.
As a result, they were forced to work for White people in various capacities especially as sharecroppers on white owned land.
In conclusion, they worked for Whites.
Find out more on sharecropping at brainly.com/question/24609477.
