1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Radda [10]
3 years ago
13

In part III of the statute, Jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he then declares that infringin

g on the principles in the statute would violate natural law. Why might Jefferson have mentioned the revocability of human law? What does he gain by doing this? What might he lose?
English
2 answers:
kykrilka [37]3 years ago
8 0
Perhaps, Jefferson is the best spokesman that speak about American Ideals of equality and liberty.
No one should be immune to the law because if there is an existence of someone that is above the law, a true equality would never be achieved

hope this helps
ivanzaharov [21]3 years ago
8 0

Jefferson metioned the revocability of human law, because he knew that laws should be updated, our capacity to changes laws and adapt to the new times is what makes us a great country, changing the law helps us consider things that our ancestors didn´t, for example not so long ago, the law didn´t allow women to vote, he gains credibility and trust from the readers, that actually elected him for continental congress after this.

You might be interested in
Why does Achilles enter the Greeks' battle with the Trojans?
ikadub [295]
D. He wants to avenge Patrocluc
5 0
3 years ago
The step of the writing process that involves organizing your thoughts is
Masteriza [31]
C webbing it’s where u make a bubble chart to organize your thoughts
3 0
3 years ago
Which word is the most different from the others?
Olin [163]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“Irony” by Jennifer T. The shards of glass littered the cold, black asphalt like sparkling stars strewn across the night sky. Th
AnnyKZ [126]
This is an example of dramatic irony. Only the readers of the poem are aware of how the character in the poem feels because she is thinking to herself. She is comparing how she sees the night sky as beautiful, but it is somebody else's tragedy.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

I hope this helps! It's a little longer than 150 words but hey!

Explanation:

Controlled wildfires are sometimes used to try and improve the ecosystem. However, they often end up causing more problems than they are worth. They lead to health problems for some, they are hard to control, expensive, and they can set off other natural disasters leading to further damage.

Like any fire, the controlled wildfires have smoke. With towns on the edges of forest nowadays, this can cause some serious health problems. Over the years, there have been several cases where, after a controlled wildfire, people near the area it took place, reported having respiratory system problems or worse chronic heart and lung diseases.

The towns right next to the places being burned, have also burned down before due to the inability to properly control the fires. In one town, in California, 14000 houses were burned down in one go. Not only do the fires cost money because of damages, but they also cost a lot to start.

Controlled fires, are costly, for example, one of these fires called the Camp Fire in California ended up costing over 16.5 billion dollars, in total. This includes damages to the town mentioned above. These damages were just from the fire, but sometimes they can cause other natural disasters.

When hillsides are stripped bare from their vegetation, it then creates the potential for a mudslide or landslide to occur. After the forest fire goes out, precipitation can cause the ash and soil from the event to begin washing downward. In 2017, Santa Barbara County experienced such an event where waist-high mud came down and 35 mph, killing at least 17 people and its wake. Rushing water also picks up debris, rocks, and even vehicles on its way down to create more damage.

In conclusion, controlled fires are costly and shouldn't be done.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In this excerpt, gilgamesh is most characterized as
    13·1 answer
  • What is the berb phrase in the sentence "all the members of the team were getting ready for the game
    5·1 answer
  • Compare the importance of meals in your culture and in a francophone country of your choice? What is the ritual of meals? What k
    8·1 answer
  • Which type of research material would be best for Susie to find weather statistics about the past years
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following paragraphs from the two articles BEST emphasizes that driverless cars are likely to become a part of ever
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone come up with an allusion for the word Frankenstein? pls
    9·1 answer
  • The works of art created by Raphael were true masterpieces.
    6·2 answers
  • 24. For many years grizzly bears were killed for their fur, their skulls.
    8·1 answer
  • What does the speaker say about the power of war? (Lincoln speech) <br>​
    5·1 answer
  • Briefly explain the difference between a message and the central idea in an informational text.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!